Dick Monfort rejected Dan O’Dowd’s proposal to fire Dan O’Dowd

In the midst of the most disappointing season in Rockies history, general manager Dan O’Dowd offered owner Dick Monfort the solution many fans desire: Fire the GM.

“I sat with Dick and said, ‘Hey, listen, it would make it easier on you, just throw me under the bus here. In some ways, I’ll be better off for it, too,'” O’Dowd told me after the club announced its latest organizational shakeup this week.

“But he won’t do that and I can’t leave him because no one knows more about this place than I do. You bring another GM here and it will take him years just to get up to speed on the issues we have here, how different it is. I don’t have all the answers, but the only way you find answers is you’ve got to try different things. You can’t think traditionally.”

This is the crux of the difference in perception inside and outside the organization. Many fans believe playing at altitude is a minor or negligible issue, just another variable like the short porch at Yankee Stadium or the wind at Wrigley Field. Even mentioning it is just an excuse for poor performance, they believe.

Within the organization, it is considered the central challenge of operating the ball club. O’Dowd calls it the Rockies’ “Goliath.” The reason they don’t talk about it more publicly is it’s already next to impossible to get free agent pitchers to come to Colorado. Emphasizing the difficulty of succeeding here as a pitcher will only make that situation worse.

But the challenge of pitching at altitude has never been clearer than this year, when O’Dowd acquired four starters from other teams — Jeremy Guthrie, Guillermo Moscoso, Josh Outman and Tyler Chatwood — and not one of them proved able to survive at Coors Field.

We have nearly 20 years worth of major league data now, and the numbers are revealing.

Try this exercise: Imagine an average major league ballclub. Over a 20-year span, how many starting pitchers on this team would put up at least three seasons of 100 or more innings pitched with an earned-run average below 4.75? Pretty low bar, right? There should be plenty.

Over the past 20 years, the average National League club has had eight such pitchers. The average club in the NL West, the Rockies’ division, has had 10.

In their entire history, the Rocks have had two: Aaron Cook and Ubaldo Jimenez.

“We worked as hard as anybody trying to find pitchers,” said Bob Gebhard, the Rocks’ general manager from 1993-99. “Our first pick in the expansion draft was David Nied, who did a nice job for us but unfortunately he got hurt. So you do the best you can in trying to add pitchers but it was extremely difficult to convince free agent pitchers to come to Denver and pitch.”

“I’ll put it this way,” said Clint Hurdle, the Rockies’ longest-serving manager, from 2002 to 2009. “This is the most challenging venue to coach, manage, perform at in major league baseball. 5280 (feet above sea level) 81 times a year, there’s nothing like it anywhere else. There are dramatic changes you’ve got to make to things.”

Hence the latest attempt to think outside the box in seeking a solution to the high-altitude riddle. Six weeks ago, O’Dowd implemented a four-man starting rotation with pitch limits on those starters, an attempt to address the Rockies’ 20-year history of injury and/or rapid deterioration among their pitchers. This week it was installing a front office executive — Bill Geivett, O’Dowd’s right-hand man — in the clubhouse, in part because the first experiment got such a lukewarm response there.

“I understand how some people are going to look at this,” O’Dowd said. “But you tell me how you look at anything traditionally in this place. What may work anywhere else is just not going to work here. If anybody knows that, I do. So I’ve got two choices. Hell, I could resign and move on. I’ll get another job. But I’ve got an owner that embraces change. He loves to look and try to do things differently. He’s not a traditional thinker.”

Many fans point to anecdotal evidence that altitude really isn’t such a big deal. C.J. Wilson comes in and throws eight innings of five-hit ball for the Angels. Cole Hamels throws eight innings of six-hit ball for the Phillies. Everybody’s pitching in the same conditions, right? Why can’t Rockies starters do that?

Of course, some of them have. That’s the problem relying on anecdotal evidence. You notice what you want to notice and ignore what you want to ignore.

Few remember that Mike Hampton was terrific in his first half-season in Colorado, going 9-2 with a 2.98 ERA through his first 13 starts in 2001. He was never the same pitcher after that. Ubaldo Jimenez was 15-1 with a 2.20 ERA through 18 starts in 2010. He’s not been the same since.

“It’s a lot different coming here and starting one time per season or two times per season or even three times per season, which is the max someone will have, than starting 16, 17, or 18 times per season,” O’Dowd said.

Fans don’t tend to notice when opposing pitchers blow up. In fact, hard as it may be to believe given the current staff’s woes, the Rocks have a better ERA at Coors Field than visiting teams since 2006.

The Dodgers’ Clayton Kershaw, the reigning National League Cy Young Award winner, has a career ERA of 2.89. His ERA at Coors Field is 5.91. Greg Maddux had a Coors Field ERA of 5.19. Curt Schilling’s was 5.51.

The Rocks have had one year in which they were able to deploy a consistent, traditional five-man rotation all season: 2009, the last time they went to the playoffs. Jimenez and Jason Marquis each started 33 times; Jorge De La Rosa, 32; Jason Hammel, 30; Cook, 27. With the exception of Hammel, each has suffered a major injury or a massive deterioration in performance since then.

“The purpose of limiting the pitch counts is that through the studies I’ve done with our trainers, Steadman-Hawkins and all of our medical people, we believe that injuries happen with load,” O’Dowd said. “When you pile on load and you are throwing pitches at the point of fatigue, that’s when the muscle tears and the tendons begin to get stretched, and that’s what causes injuries.

“This was a lost year. I wasn’t trying to develop a model to save this season. I’m trying to develop a model that has a chance to work here long after I’m gone. Because the environmental parts of this aren’t going to change.”

But experimenting with baseball orthodoxy requires an experimental mindset that baseball players, coaches and managers don’t often have. Playing every day for six months, baseball is a game of routine, of doing the same thing over and over and over again.

“My conclusion is we have to do it differently,” O’Dowd said. “We can’t do it traditionally the same way. That doesn’t mean we don’t get back to that at some point in time, but right now where we’re at, with the inexperience we have,  we are going to have to pitch differently. We are going to have to have a different concept and it’s going to have to be an ever-changing one.

“This is a ballpark about adaptability. I did not anticipate the ballpark was going to play the way it did this year because it hadn’t for the last four years. Why it is? Hell, I don’t know. There are other things that come up in this ballpark that I’ll never be able to truly understand but we’re going to have to be able to adapt to it a hell of a lot quicker than we did this year without fighting so many battles to be able to try something different and unique.

“We have to have a thought process of adaptability. We cannot think traditionally if we’re ever going to have any kind of sustained success here. If we do nothing, every ten years we’ll win twice, guarantee you. Every ten years, everything will fall into place and we’ll win twice. I’d like to have something that stands for a little more than that.”

They call the NFL a copycat league but no sport worships conformity more than baseball. In the early 1970s, most teams used four-man starting rotations. When the conversion to five-man rotations began, every single team fell rapidly in line. So when O’Dowd began tinkering with accepted norms, beginning with the four-man rotation and pitch limits, he found resistance not only among the chattering class, but also in his own clubhouse. That’s why Geivett is now taking up residence there — to help sell the experimental approaches the Rocks expect to try.

O’Dowd recognized that he needed a diplomat in this role. He also recognized that diplomacy is not his forte.

“The bottom line is we have to come up with a different model,” he said. “The altitude’s not going to change. Do you realize that even if we dome this place, we could not create enough barometric pressure to come close to normalizing the environment indoors? You couldn’t pump enough air in here to make that happen. You could bring it down some, but we’re at 5,183 feet above sea level. The next closest club is the Diamondbacks at 1,040 feet. Do you see how well we play every spring (in Arizona)?”

Strange but true: The elevations of other NL stadiums are minuscule compared to Coors Field, but the Rocks persistently play better at the stadiums that are relatively higher and worse at those comparatively lower. While most of the focus is on their pitching, their hitters consistently struggle with the transition from altitude to sea level at the end of each home stand, adjusting each time to the greater break of the pitches they face.

“We were certainly aware of the splits in the averages,” Gebhard said of the Rockies’ early days. “The great hitters, the Larry Walkers and the Andres Galarragas, at times would have as much as a 100-point spread between home and away.

“Dante Bichette, way back when, had his own little pitching machine. It was a curve ball machine that he would take with him on the road trip and get into a batting tunnel at the stadium and have it throw nothing but curve balls.

“That was a very true issue because playing at Coors Field, you’d see a curve ball and it would be a spinner and it might be good one time and not so good the next time. And all of a sudden the next day you’re playing in Chicago or you’re playing in Atlanta and that same curve ball is a quality pitch. We struggled with that. I can’t say that we came up with a sound solution but we were well aware of that and hitters were frustrated because they would go on the road and the first couple days we didn’t hit very good.”

Many outsiders, clearly, don’t buy any of it. In some cases, this is because they haven’t studied it. Nobody in the game thinks it is an insignificant factor. They just don’t have any idea what to do about it. Most of them are glad to play here only occasionally.

“We’ve only got to be here three days and we’re getting out of town,” Hurdle said with a laugh when he visited Coors last month with his current team, the Pirates. “We don’t have to worry about it.”

If he can find the right candidate, O’Dowd plans to create another new position in the organization when the season is over: director of pitching operations. He wants someone to supervise the way the Rocks develop pitchers throughout their system rather than having a different pitching coach doing his own thing at every level.

He knows that all of this will be seen as an excuse or worse by many who don’t walk in his shoes.

“Hey, listen: At 52, turning 53, I realize I’m on the back end of my career. I’m just at a point in time where I want to do what I think is right and I’m not all that concerned what people say about me.

“I know I’m throwing myself under the bus from a perception standpoint. I know what I’m doing. But I also think it’s the right thing to do. So what do you do? You talk the talk or you walk the walk. Whatever everybody’s going to say, they’re going to say. The only thing that matters is if we find something here that works better than what’s working right now, and has ever worked.

“A market our size, and our payroll, you win more than you lose every 2.7 years. The goal of this thing for me is not winning defined that way. The goal for me is to find something that has a chance to have sustainable success so the peaks aren’t so high and the valleys aren’t so low. That has nothing to do with our personnel model. That has everything to do with the Goliath we face every single day.”


Do the Broncos have enough weapons for Peyton Manning?

It’s not that fewer people had opinions in the old days. It’s just that before Twitter and Facebook, we didn’t experience the pleasure of hearing every single one of them.

Today, in order to stand out from the technologically-enhanced peanut gallery, your opinion has to be different, or at least loud, which is why any unexpressed view, no matter how inane, is just a vacuum waiting to be filled.

So we had the original reaction to the Broncos’ signing of Peyton Manning, natural and reasonable, that any team quarterbacked by a four-time Most Valuable Player should likely be included on any list of prospective championship contenders. That’s why there are nearly as many national media types at Dove Valley this week as there are players on the Broncos’ training camp roster.

Then came the first wave of blowback — the harbingers of wait just a minute. They wonder about the defense, they wonder about Manning’s health and even his prodigal perspicacity after a year off and multiple neck surgeries. But mostly, they wonder about Manning’s weapons.

Demaryius Thomas may have been a first-round draft pick, they allow, but through his first two pro campaigns, his high-water mark for catches in a season is 32. Eric Decker strikes a similar national profile — big, fast and athletic, granted, but also a similarly modest career high in receptions of 44.

Certain facts tend to go unmentioned in these revisionist bits of analysis. For example, the fact that each is entering just his third season. Or the fact that Kyle Orton threw nearly all of his passes to Brandon Lloyd during their rookie season. Or the fact that the Broncos reverted to a single wing offense last season, producing the 31st-ranked passing game in a 32-team league.

Mere details. Those who now differentiate themselves from the crowd argue Manning won’t be Manning without the crew of Hall of Fame-bound receivers he enjoyed in Indianapolis.

Of course, Manning had a little something to do with the pending Canton reservations of Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne. Good receivers make a good quarterback better, but a great quarterback makes good receivers better, too.

Anyway, we turn to someone who knows a little something about quarterbacking championship teams for an expert view on this dispute.

John Elway might be a tad biased — he’s the architect of the Broncos’ roster — but he’s also a guy who helped make famous largely unknown young receivers named Shannon Sharpe, Rod Smith and Ed McCaffrey.

“As a former quarterback, I like the targets,” Elway said when he stopped by the KOA broadcast tent at Dove Valley.

“When I look at Demaryius Thomas going into his third year and the way he played the last half of (last) year and the confidence that he’s going to come back into this year with, and the OTAs, I mean, he improved immensely in the OTAs. He had a great day (Thursday). Eric Decker I really like. Those are big, fast wide receivers that I always liked.

“Brandon Stokley’s going to come in and add some experience. Bubba Caldwell from Cincinnati has got some experience in the league and has great speed, has the ability to make the big play. And then we’ve got some young guys that we’re excited about — D’Andre Goodwin, Mark Dell, who got hurt in the preseason last year.

“Plus we feel really good about the tight ends (Joel Dreessen, Jacob Tamme, Virgil Green, Julius Thomas). We’ve got (Ronnie) Hillman in the backfield with Willis (McGahee) and so I believe we’ve got a lot of good things going on on the offensive side also.”

Elway was convinced last season that the Broncos’ biggest weakness was not the receiving corps but the defensive backfield. Aside from the courtship of Manning, that’s where he concentrated his attention during the offseason.

“Other than the quarterback position, that’s probably where we’ve improved the most,” he said. “If you look at the football team last year, when we got exposed is when people spread us out — Detroit, New England, even San Diego, although we did a good job against San Diego.

“When we got spread out, we struggled. But Tracy Porter coming in with the experience he has, Drayton Florence has great experience, and then Omar Bolden, who we drafted in the fourth round. Chris Harris, the year he had last year. We bring Mike Adams in at safety and then Rahim Moore and Quinton Carter are going to have a year under their belts. So I’m excited about what we’ve got back there.”

Elway isn’t afraid to talk about championship contention — he thinks the potential is there if fortune smiles — but he knows from experience that predictions in July are subject to the vicissitudes of November and December.

“If you look at where we started a year and a half ago (when Elway took over the front office) and where we are right now, we’re really excited about it,” he said.

“Like any season, you have to get lucky. Injuries can always kill you. The unknown is always there and that’s why I always kind of temper my enthusiasm and excitement, because you never know what can happen. But I think with the people that we’ve got on this football field, we have an opportunity to compete for a world championship. There’s a lot of things that have to fall in line. But we’re excited about where we are.”


As Manning era begins, Broncos welcome great expectations

When John Fox arrived as the Broncos’ new head coach last year, nobody expected much. The team he was taking over had gone 4-12 in 2010, and few experts thought it would do much better in 2011.

A year later, as Fox enters his second season in Colorado, his team has the top national story of training camp — the comeback of Peyton Manning — and many analysts are picking it to win the AFC West.

“I would hope the longer you’re in an organization that the expectations increase,” Fox said Wednesday after players reported for training camp.

“I don’t think that hurts anything. I would hope that everybody in that locker room or in that 4 o’clock meeting today has got great expectations. I think if you look around at the other 31 cities in the National Football League, I would say that everybody’s goal is to win that world championship. That’s kind of what I think everybody’s expectations are.”

The overflow media crowd at Dove Valley on Wednesday reflected intense national interest in Manning’s comeback after the four-time Most Valuable Player missed all of last season rehabilitating from neck surgery. Sports Illustrated’s Peter King listed it as the NFL’s top summer story line as he embarked on his annual tour of training camps.

Reporters and analysts will be watching Manning’s passing in camp, trying to gauge his arm strength and endurance. Dove Valley insiders say he has brought an unparalleled work ethic since signing with the Broncos as a free agent in March.

“Obviously, we’re very excited,” Fox said. “Peyton’s done everything humanly possible, both physically and mentally, to get ready for this. I know he’s excited, the rest of our team’s excited, but he’s a tremendous competitor and we’re very blessed to have him.

“I think physically he’s made tremendous improvement. I’m not sure I’ve ever been around a player with as intense work ethic as him, both physically and mentally. So he’s worked very hard. He didn’t take the last five weeks off by any stretch. By all indications he’s made great progress and we’re happy with where he is.”

Fox and his staff are hopeful that Manning’s perfectionism will rub off on his teammates as camp goes on.

“Peyton’s going to be himself,” Fox said. “What (that’s) been is a tremendous leader, a great student of the game. When you’ve won the MVP that many times and you’ve had the accomplishments on the field he has, he can’t help but have some swagger to him, and I think that’s contagious.

“We said early on that he’s the type of player that raises all boats, from how they practice, how they approach practice. I’m talking about his teammates. He’s a very unselfish guy, a great teammate, and that should be a very positive influence on our team.”

Like every NFL team, the Broncos have plenty of questions going into camp. Elvis Dumervil spoke with reporters Wednesday but declined comment on his arrest in Florida last week, saying he would await the results of the ongoing investigation by Florida law enforcement authorities. Fox said the club would do the same. Dumervil was initially charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon following an incident described as a traffic confrontation in Miami Beach.

With linebacker D.J. Williams suspended for at least the first six games of the season after failing a league drug test, Fox acknowledged that the veteran linebacker is unlikely to line up with the first-team defense in camp.

Williams tweeted earlier that he had been moved from his weak-side linebacker position during the offseason, prompting speculation that Von Miller, last year’s NFL defensive rookie of the year, might move to the weak side to accentuate his pass rushing abilities. Joe Mays is the incumbent middle linebacker on run downs. With Williams out, Wesley Woodyard may be the leading candidate to join the starting lineup entering camp.

Fox also said he has no specific “pitch count” for Manning — a limit on the number of throws he makes per practice or per day as he regains arm strength following a season on the injured list — but said he will monitor how his arm is feeling as camp progresses.

Between the expectations that come with Manning and the opening of a new season, spirits were high Wednesday, the manicured practice fields ready for the first workout Thursday morning.

“With each season, what’s great about the NFL, it’s new,” Fox said. “It’s 32 teams all 0-0. It’s a new race, so to speak. It’s always good getting the guys back. They all look good, they have smiles on their faces and they’re excited about getting this training camp started.”


How to pitch at Coors Field

Jeremy Guthrie might be this season’s highest-profile meltdown of a pitcher new to Coors Field, but he’s not exactly the lone ranger:

Guillermo Moscoso had an earned-run average of 3.38 last season for Oakland, mostly as a starter. Obtained by the Rockies with Josh Outman in exchange for outfielder Seth Smith, his ERA was 8.23 in two big league stints before being returned to the minor leagues. It was 11.21 at Coors; 2.79 elsewhere.

Outman had a 3.70 ERA for the A’s last season. In his first year with the Rocks, that number is 9.00. He, too, has been returned to the minors.

Tyler Chatwood, obtained from the Angels for catcher Chris Iannetta, had an ERA of 4.75 in the American League as a 21-year-old. At 22, for the Rocks, his ERA is 7.62. Like the others, he is now a minor leaguer.

So it seems worth getting some insight into the specific difficulties pitchers face making their pitches in the less-dense air a mile above sea level. Unfortunately, when you go looking for big league hurlers who found a way to succeed at Coors and are willing to talk about it, you find it’s a pretty small group.

No one has taken the mound more often for the Rockies over the past three seasons than reliever Matt Belisle. He led the team in appearances two years ago with 76 and again last year with 74. This season he leads with 45 through 88 games, one back of the league leader, Shawn Camp of the Cubs. In a year in which the Rocks were determined to get Belisle’s appearances below 70, he’s on a pace for 83.

He also leads the club in earned-run average at 2.25, a number that was 1.88 before he was charged with two runs Saturday night against the Phillies. The previous two seasons he compiled ERAs of 2.93 (2010) and 3.25 (2011) — microscopic by Rockies standards. His splits this year are 2.92 at Coors and 1.54 elsewhere.

He wasn’t feeling great Saturday night after giving up two extra-base hits down the right field line in the ninth, but he was accommodating, as always. I started by asking if there are pitches he eliminates from his repertoire at altitude or pitches he relies on more at sea level.

“I guess the answer to that question is yes,” he said. “Do I eliminate? No. I know what happens to the spin or the bite, so to speak, on my off-speed pitches here compared to other places. The break size is going to be different. Sometimes the speed is different. So I’ve had to learn how to adapt my sights, my vision of where I’m releasing the ball, to make sure that I compensate for the lack of bite. So I guess what I’m trying to say is when we leave here, my rotation seems a little tighter and I get better snap on my pitches.

“All that means is I have to adapt and focus more on locating here and when I do mix speeds, to make sure that the arm speed’s there and the approach is extremely aggressive. When you’re feeling good with your spin, sometimes you can get away with sort of flipping one in there. You can’t do that here. That kind of got me in trouble tonight, actually.

“So I think it’s just an adaptability of focus. Is it a change? Yes. How significant it is I think is up to the person.”

Although Rockies pitchers tend to avoid talking about the effects of altitude publicly for fear of sounding like they’re making excuses, they do discuss it frequently among themselves. Complicating those discussions is the fact that altitude seems to act differently on each pitcher and each pitch. There are few rules that work for everybody.

“We’ve all talked about it in here,” Belisle said. “Some people have their arsenal change in similar fashions and some are a little different. So I think it’s up to the individual to really acknowledge what you have and what’s going on and just really focus on (keeping the ball) lower and understanding that the break will be a little different.

“Five out of seven of the guys in the bullpen may say their curve ball suffers, but two of them may say, ‘Actually my curve ball’s great; it’s my slider that has problems.’

“But that’s the same phenomenon as one guy can throw the exact same baseball and it feels like a bowling ball and the other guy, it feels light. It’s what he can do with the snap. So there is a change. It’s just something you have to adapt to.”

The modern emphasis on radar guns and computerized strike zones on television may give fans the impression that pitching is science, but it’s much more art. From one outing to another, a pitcher’s feel of his pitches may change dramatically. Altitude adds yet another variable.

Breaking pitches are more vulnerable because, lacking the velocity of the fastball, they sit up begging to be crushed if they lack their customary snap. But the lighter air can also affect the downward plane of the sinker, or two-seam fastball, leaving it, like the breaking ball, sitting up too high in the strike zone.

“It could be all of them, but I think everybody’s more affected with the breaking balls, the off-speed pitches,” Belisle said. “The fastball/sinker does change a little bit as well. Sometimes it may run instead of really corkscrew down.

“Then when you go on the road, you’ve got to kind of make sure and re-set because all of a sudden the bite’s a little more, so the same pitch that was a strike for my curve ball may be a ball if I’m throwing it at the exact same release point, so I’ve got to kind of change that.”

So you have a different release point at altitude than you do at sea level?

“Yeah, because my sight has to change. We’re talking very small.”

Is that a mechanical adjustment?

“Well, not so much a mechanical adjustment as it is the timing of when I release the pitch, when I say it’s a different release point.”

So it’s the same arm slot, but you may have to release the ball a little earlier or a little later?

“Correct. I may have to get rid of the ball a little later in Colorado and not even think about it so much on the road. But if I’m here for a week and then go on the road, while I’m playing catch, I’ll get a feel of, OK, that one was a strike in Colorado but now it’s a ball because it bit a lot more.”

So the pitch that was a strike in Colorado ends up in the dirt at sea level because of the added break?

“Right. But my biggest thing is, it’s not a crutch. It’s not an excuse. It’s just, it is what it is. It’s a condition that we have to work with. The same thing if you get a ball that the rub is really bad or if you’ve got a wet ball that day.

“There’s plenty of things that are thrown at us to try to gain inconsistency in this game. I don’t think we need to allow any of this to be an excuse or a crutch because we’re here long enough to where we can adapt to it. It’s significant, it is something there, but you just have to really be on top of yourself to work on it every day, understand what you need to do.”

I asked if Belisle has noticed fellow pitchers who have trouble dealing psychologically with these constant adjustments.

“I don’t know,” he said. “I know we all talk about it. I know anybody who’s new that comes over here in the past four years that I’ve been here, we talk about it and address it. But that’s up to the individual. We as teammates need to make sure we’re not using anything as an excuse, but whatever cards you’re dealt, whatever you feel that day, you’ve got to figure out and adapt how you’re going to get the guy out because you sure as heck can.

“Maybe some people can use it as a negative, but I try to look at it as an opportunity. If I can become so adept at understanding what my pitches are doing, make those adjustments here and then go on the road and feel like I’ve got even more snap with better, nasty, slow-speed pitches, and then we come here and I can adapt to that again, where a visiting team comes in and really has a tough time because they don’t play here, I feel like that’s an opportunity for me to learn myself better and really take it as a mental challenge to be tougher, because I will not allow excuses. So I look at it more as an opportunity. It’s a fight, but it’s an opportunity.”

I pointed out the dramatic deterioration in the numbers of all four potential starters — Guthrie, Moscoso, Outman and Chatwood — brought in from other organizations this year. These were adequate major league pitchers last season who suddenly can’t get anybody out, I said.

“Yeah. I don’t know what to tell you,” Belisle said. “I mean, pitching’s not easy, period. But all I can say is acknowledge that with most people there is a change in your stuff. And we all have to adapt and be on top of that. You have to do that to the best of your ability and look at it as an opportunity and do not use it as an excuse.”

You can see where the need for constant adjustments in release point would seem like a nightmare from an organizational point of view. The goal of many pitching coaches is to get their charges to find the right delivery mechanics and then repeat them over and over until they become second nature. If you’re constantly fiddling with your release point depending on where you’re pitching, that consistency of repetition is impossible to achieve.

Many fans point to opposing pitchers who come to Colorado and dominate in a single outing — say, C.J. Wilson of the Angels before the All-Star break or Cole Hamels of the Phillies on Sunday. But pitching at Coors once a year is very different from pitching there on a regular basis. Mike Hampton succeeded for half a season before crashing. Ubaldo Jimenez had a sensational first half in 2010 (15-1, 2.20), wilted in the second half (4-7, 3.80) and has not been the same since. It’s not clear if the wear is more mental or physical.

At the All-Star game, Wilson said he basically eliminated his two-seam fastball in his lone start here because he had more confidence in the lateral movement of his cutter than the downward movement of his sinker at altitude. But in a park that puts such a premium on keeping the ball down, the Rocks as an organization can hardly afford to eliminate the two-seamer from the staff repertoire.

Still, as Guthrie demonstrated Saturday night, it can take an inning to get a feel for the release point that keeps the ball down and one bad inning at Coors can be all it takes to ruin a start.

It’s also probably easier for relievers such as Belisle to make those constant adjustments since each outing is so much shorter than it is for starters. This is one of the reasons for the Rockies’ recent pitch limits on starters — to make their focus more like that of a reliever.

It’s not clear whether the failure of any Rockies starter to sustain success over a career is a function of the extra physical effort required to make balls move at altitude, the potential for injury created by constantly changing release points or the mental strain of the battle.

But Belisle’s description of his mental approach suggests that perhaps the most important attribute of a pitcher donning a Rockies uniform is mental discipline — the ability to view pitching at altitude as a challenge rather than a conspiracy to ruin his numbers. Consciously or subconsciously, the pitchers who have failed here most spectacularly seemed to blame altitude, not themselves, for their issues. Belisle, by contrast, has been a better pitcher here than he was during his previous stint in Cincinnati.

This remains the essential dilemma of big-league baseball a mile high. The effects of altitude are real; any honest pitcher will tell you that. To succeed here, a pitcher has to adjust for those effects and adjust back at sea level without resorting to the defense mechanism of blaming all those changes when things go wrong. It’s a tough psychological line to walk, and it’s tougher still to predict how any particular pitcher will deal with it before he gets here. Twenty years in, the Rocks remain a long way from a solution.


The latest Coors Field casualty

If you happened to be among the 35,151 people who paid (or managed a ticket from someone who had) to see the Rockies play the Phillies on Saturday night, you saw the most recent version of the species of baseball player known as the Coors Field casualty.

Jeremy Guthrie has joined a small but distinguished group of pitchers (and one manager) who were driven to distraction and ultimately defeated by Coors Field, or by the altitude at which it sits. Each retreated into his own defensive bubble, refusing to acknowledge the elephant in the ballpark because they couldn’t accept their inability to overcome it.

Keep in mind Guthrie was acquired over the offseason to be the veteran leader of the pitching staff. Looking over his previous three seasons, Rockies management saw a horse who never missed a start, threw 200 or more innings every year, pitched for lousy teams in Baltimore and never complained. What they got was the opposite — a head case who can’t show leadership to the Rocks’ young pitchers because he can’t get out of his own way.

One sarcastic gesture — tipping his cap to the crowd as one of his early exits was accompanied by a symphony of boos — offered all the insight necessary into the psychological shield he has raised to protect himself from what no doubt seem like the slings and arrows of some strange and foreign planet.

Following his ninth loss in 12 decisions Saturday night, when he gave up four runs, all in the first inning, and came out in the fifth, this was Guthrie’s post-game session with the inquiring minds:

Q: So what’s your diagnosis? What happened in the first inning?

A: Just a, you know, got behind to (Carlos) Ruiz and he took a good hack and, you know, a three-run homer.

Q: That’s it? What about the hits that led up to that?

A: You know, the fastball away, 1-0 count, off the plate a little bit, (Chase Utley) did a nice job to punch in (Shane) Victorino. Victorino was a fastball up in the zone, 0-2, tried to elevate it, got it at his letters but he did a nice job and hit it into the gap. I walked (Ryan) Howard, I think it was on five pitches, got behind him. I think that’s all the hits. I think that’s all the results of the first inning.

Q: Especially after the first inning, you were able to keep it under control after that, do you feel like you have a pretty good pattern, at least here at home?

A: I think so. I mean, I’ve got the longest scoreless streak of my career at Coors, so there’s a lot of positives to build on. It’s a career low in runs allowed in a start as well. So there’s positives to build on and you’ve got to take what you can and go for it.

Q: At this point is it trying to just build on something like that, considering how it’s gone so far?

A: Yeah. You always find the positives and try to build on ’em. That’s what I try to do. That’s the kind of person I am and if it works out I’m pleased; if it doesn’t, I’ll keep that same attitude in baseball and in life.

Q: Jeremy, was it self-evident to you from the first inning what you needed to adjust or did anybody have a chat with you between the first and second?

A: No, no chat. It came down to one pitch, really. Three-one. The Utley pitch wasn’t a mistake. It was where I was trying to go. The Victorino pitch was where I was trying to throw it. The walk is not what I was trying to do. I look at it every at-bat, every pitch. You look at four runs and you just think the world’s coming to an end, but it really came down to one big pitch, to Ruiz, to one of the best hitters in the league right now.

When the brief group session was over, I asked Guthrie if I could ask him a couple of further questions, one-on-one.

“No,” he said. “Thank you.” And then he hightailed it out of the clubhouse.

Now, granted, this refusal could well be because of my personal charm. Guthrie would not be the first athlete who, given a choice, declined an opportunity to spend any more time than necessary answering my questions. But he also gave me a flashback to the most famous Coors Field casualty of the Rockies’ first 20 years, who gave me a similar response when I tried to talk to him one-on-one about pitching here.

In 2001, Mike Hampton got the biggest contract ever given to a pitcher at the time — eight years, $121 million. He’s the poster boy of Coors Field casualties. The Rockies broke the bank to sign him after coming off consecutive (pre-humidor) seasons in which their starters pitched to earned-run averages of 6.19 and 5.59, numbers that might sound familiar if you’ve followed this year’s team, whose starters are currently at 6.06.

Hampton had gone 37-12 over the previous two seasons for the Astros and Mets. He was a power sinker ball pitcher, exactly what their home launch pad seemed to demand. So the Rocks overpaid in a big way to snare the top free agent pitcher of the year.

His first start was awe-inspiring. He threw 8 1/3 innings of five-hit, shutout ball at Coors Field against the Cardinals. On June 10, when he beat the Cardinals again, he was 9-2 with a 2.98 ERA and a National League All-Star for the second time.

From there, it went downhill in a hurry. By the end of July, he had lost six of his previous seven decisions and the ERA had swelled to 4.97. His jaw tightened in post-game interviews. He retreated to formulaic answers, just as Guthrie has, reciting his pitches in a bland monotone the way a golfer recites his shots. This pitch missed, that pitch got too much of the plate. He denied any larger issues. The competitor in him would not allow him to acknowledge them, at least not publicly.

He finished the season with a record of 14-13 and an ERA of 5.41. For a pitcher who had put up ERAs of 2.90 and 3.14 the two previous seasons, it was impossible to accept. He couldn’t have suddenly forgotten how to pitch. It had to be the park. The park or the altitude; either way, this $%&* place!

By his second year, Hampton was such a mess that his road ERA exceeded his Coors Field ERA, which is not the case for Guthrie. At sea level, Guthrie has been the guy the Rocks traded for — actually a little better than the guy they traded for — pitching to an ERA of 3.67. True, he’s only 2-4, but he’s used to pitching pretty well and losing; it happened all the time with the Orioles.

But in Colorado he’s now 1-5 with an ERA of 9.23. In body language and impassive post-game postmortems, he seems to be all but shouting, Get me outta here!

For Hampton, the splits didn’t matter as much as the general deterioration. The harder he gripped the ball, the more he tried to force it to do what he wanted, the less it did. Again, this was pre-humidor, when many pitchers attributed the absence of break in their pitches to the feel of the baseball, which they said was slick as a billiard ball.

Relatively successful hurlers at Coors — the few, the proud — adjust to the reduced movement of their pitches in the less-dense air at altitude, and then adjust back when they go to sea level. By the end of his second and final season with the Rockies — he went 7-15 with a 6.15 ERA — Hampton wanted nothing but to follow Bob Seger’s advice and get out of Denver. The Rocks obliged, but the financial burden of his fully guaranteed contract — and those they took on in exchange for it — haunted them for years.

The original Coors Field casualty was Greg Harris, a breaking ball specialist, and he didn’t even pitch at Coors Field. The Rocks were playing at Mile High Stadium during their inaugural season when they traded for two Padres starters — Harris and Bruce Hurst. Harris had burst on the scene as a reliever in his early years in San Diego, his out pitch a devastating 12-to-6 curve ball.

The Padres converted him into a starter in 1991. He was 10-9 with a 3.67 ERA when the Rocks traded for him on July 26, 1993. After his arrival, he went 1-8 with a 6.50 ERA. His curve no longer broke; it just spun up to the plate with a little sign on it that said, “Hit me!”

The following season, 1994, he went 3-12 with a 6.55 ERA. When the season was over, the Rocks released him. He was 30 and he was done. The Twins gave him a shot the following year. He went 0-5, 8.82 and called it a career.

Another Coors Field casualty was not a pitcher at all. Manager Jim Leyland quit on the Rocks in 1999, walking away from the final two years of his contract. The club lost 90 games that year and Leyland decided he couldn’t manage in a place where he didn’t recognize the game.

We now add Guthrie to the list. Jason Hammel, the starter for whom he was traded, is 8-6 for the Orioles with a 3.54 ERA. Indignant fans want general manager Dan O’Dowd fired for making such a terrible trade. Of course, Hammel was 7-13 with a 4.76 ERA last season for Colorado. If you don’t think altitude has a lot to do with both Hammel’s sudden improvement and Guthrie’s sudden deterioration, you haven’t been tracking this thing as long as the Rockies have.

For most of the past 20 years, Rocks management has declined to discuss the challenges of pitching at altitude in any detail. Acknowledge it, they figure, and you’ve given your pitchers a built-in excuse if they perform poorly. This year, they have acknowledged it in perhaps the most explicit way yet, switching to a four-man starting rotation with a limited pitch count.

O’Dowd admitted to season-ticket holders that the organization still hasn’t solved the riddle of pitching here. He also told them that starters who pitch a normal workload for three years at altitude tend to suffer debilitating injuries. The limited pitch count is an effort to prevent their pitchers from destroying themselves.

On the bright side, pitching successfully here is not impossible. In the next post on this blog, a conversation with someone who’s done it.


Roger Staubach: Great quarterbacks make their teammates believe

For a moment, Roger Staubach pretended not to remember. Ever the gentleman, the Hall of Fame quarterback and Naval Academy graduate was in Denver last month on business, but he was not looking to remind Broncos fans that he destroyed their dreams thirty-four years ago.

“I don’t even remember that game,” he said with a smile when I asked about Super Bowl XII. “That was a long time ago. In Denver, I don’t like to talk about it.”

The nostalgia that surrounds the Broncos’ first trip to the Super Bowl tends to skip quickly over the final game. Up until then, 1977 was a magical year. The Orange Crush defense gave up the third-fewest points in the 28-team NFL and led the Broncos to a 12-2 record.

Veteran Craig Morton, in his first season in Colorado after being acquired from the New York Giants, provided stability, if not brilliance, at quarterback. He was named the Associated Press comeback player of the year after starting all 14 games at age 34. He had gone 2-10 as a starter for the Giants the season before, prompting widespread speculation that he was finished.

In Denver, his offense was built on a four-headed running game consisting of Otis Armstrong, Lonnie Perrin, Rob Lytle and Jon Keyworth. But Morton also threw for 14 touchdowns and just eight interceptions, improving his passer rating from 55.6 the year before to 82.0.

When the Broncos reached their first Super Bowl in New Orleans on Jan. 15, 1978, they met Staubach’s Cowboys in a championship matchup of quarterbacks who had been rivals for the Dallas starting job several years before.

“Playing against Craig, I was really uncomfortable,” Staubach said. “We came out of college together. We actually played in the College All-Star Game. Four years later, I joined the Cowboys. Don Meredith retired and Craig took over. He was good to me. He had some injuries, we battled back and forth and I got a chance to start. He was a starting quarterback too, so it could have gone either way.

“I got the chance to stay in Dallas. He went to the Giants and then went to Denver and had an MVP(-type) season. They were a great team with the Orange Crush. We were in that crazy dome. It was the first indoor Super Bowl, in New Orleans, in that dome, and it was loud. In the first quarter, we fumbled a punt on the 1-yard line. If Denver recovers . . . .

“So we actually got some turnovers from Denver. Our turnovers, it seemed like, we recovered. So the first quarter, even I — I mean, coach (Tom) Landry said, ‘Get these guys under control,’ and I said, ‘Hey coach, I gotta get under control. I can’t hear anything.'”

The game was a mess. Unaccustomed to the noise level of the Superdome, both teams played as if the ball was dipped in butter. Cowboys receiver Butch Johnson fumbled on the game’s first play, a double reverse, but recovered his own miscue.

As Staubach mentioned, wide receiver Tony Hill fumbled a Broncos punt at his own 1-yard line later in the first quarter, but he, too, fell on it before the Broncos could recover. Cowboys running back Tony Dorsett fumbled on his own 19 a few plays later, but center John Fitzgerald recovered.

The Broncos were not so lucky. Morton threw two early interceptions that led to Dallas scores and an early 10-0 lead. It could have been worse. Two more Morton interceptions led to failed field goal attempts by Cowboys kicker Efren Herrera.

Morton threw half as many picks in the first half as he had all season. Add three fumbles and the Broncos, who had been plus 12 in turnovers during the regular season, had an incredible seven giveaways by halftime on their way to a 27-10 loss. After nearly throwing his fifth interception early in the second half, Morton was replaced by Norris Weese.

“It just was our day and our defense played great,” Staubach said. “People love Craig Morton in Dallas. He’s a really good guy and he was a great player. Obviously, they were pulling for me, too, but it was a weird time in my life because I’m playing against a guy that left Dallas, so if we would have lost, it would have been even a double whammy for me. But we won and it was a good win for us. I mean, the Orange Crush had a great year that year.

“It was our second Super Bowl win. I’ve learned to be humble. I won two and lost two. (Terry) Bradshaw and the Steelers are a bunch of Taliban, actually. You’ve got to stay humble. But we had a really good team in ’77.”

Now 70, Staubach sold his real estate firm, The Staubach Company, to Jones Lang LaSalle four years ago. But he remains active in the business. It was a JLL event that brought him to Denver, where he and Peyton Manning regaled some of the firm’s clients with football talk and one-liners.

A year after their victory over the Broncos, the Cowboys went back to the Super Bowl with arguably an even better team. But they met the Steelers in the first Super Bowl rematch and lost to them for the second time, 35-31.

“I think about that a lot,” Staubach said. “It kind of determined the team of the ’70s. We were in five Super Bowls in the ’70s. I quarterbacked four of them. Actually, Craig was hurt a lot in that (first) game (Super Bowl V) when we lost to Baltimore on that field goal, 16-13.

“Pittsburgh was really a good team, and so were we. We were the only NFC team in the ’70s to win a Super Bowl. We won two of ’em. The AFC dominated, and then in the ’80s it changed with New York and San Francisco.

“There were a lot of key plays in the game, things that happened. One of the tough calls was that Lynn Swann interference call.”

Early in the fourth quarter, Cowboys defensive back Bennie Barnes was called for pass interference after he and Swann collided. Replays showed Swann ran into him. The Cowboys thought it should have been ruled incidental contact. The penalty gave the Steelers a first down at the Cowboys’ 23-yard line. Pittsburgh converted the opportunity into a touchdown, stretching its lead to 28-17.

“You can’t blame anything on the referees, by the way,” Staubach said with a smile. “But at that time we were kind of in charge. We had the momentum in the third quarter. It was 21-17. I threw kind of a low pass to Jackie Smith that would have tied the game.”

That turned into one of the more famous plays in Super Bowl history. Smith was a veteran tight end who had been named to five Pro Bowls earlier in his career as a member of the St. Louis Cardinals. By Super Bowl XIII, he was a month from his 39th birthday. Wide open in the back of the end zone, his feet went out from under him as he dropped Staubach’s throw. A touchdown would have tied the game at 21. Instead, the Cowboys settled for a field goal and never got closer.

Staubach explained that when the play came in from the sideline he thought it was a mistake. The call was a goal-line play featuring three tight ends but the Cowboys had the ball at the 11-yard line. Staubach called timeout and walked to the sideline. Landry admitted the mistake, Staubach said. But, barred from changing personnel on the field without running a play, he decided to stick with the call.

From the goal line, the play called for Smith to run an 11-yard route to the back of the end zone. Had Smith run that route from the 11, he would have ended up right at the goal line and “the ball would have been right there,” Staubach said.

But with Steelers linebacker Jack Lambert blitzing, Staubach had to release the ball in anticipation of Smith’s move. Instead of turning at the goal line, Smith drifted toward the back of the end zone, closer to the position where he was supposed to end up when the play was run from the goal line. “He was all alone, nobody was anywhere near him,” Staubach recalled.

By the time Smith turned, the ball was on him, lower than he expected. His feet went out from under him and he dropped it. The play could have tied the game at 21. Instead, the Cowboys settled for a Rafael Septien field goal and never got closer.

“He just got killed for that,” Staubach said of Smith. “It was just a good game and it was a tough loss. The Steelers were a really good team. That was our best team. We had Dorsett. Besides Drew Pearson, we had Tony Hill and Butch Johnson, Billy Joe (DuPree). We had a great offense that year. We led the NFL in offense.

“So that really gave the Steelers the ’70s. Kind of put us into a ‘Really good team of the ’70s,’ but if you voted for the team of the ’70s, it was . . . what was the name of that team again? Oh, yeah, Pittsburgh.”

Staubach laughed. “No, they were really good. They beat us and it was a heck of a game.”

Long before head injuries became a serious legal liability for the NFL, Staubach’s career ended with his retirement after the 1979 season. He was still near the top of his game, having led the Cowboys to an 11-5 record with 27 touchdowns and 11 interceptions. But he had suffered multiple concussions and decided discretion was the better part of valor.

More than 30 years later, Staubach is mentally sharp with a dry sense of humor. I asked what he thought of all the lawsuits that have been filed against the league claiming inadequate treatment of and attention to head injuries.

“Well, I don’t think they did anything intentionally, to be honest with you,” he said. “I’m not involved in any of these lawsuits. There’s like 80 of them or something like that in the NFL. It’s a serious issue with the litigation right now.

“I really didn’t have a thorough CAT scan until my last year, and I had eight concussions. They would test you out. I never went back into a game when I was knocked out. I’m talking about concussions where I’m knocked out. But I played the next week.

“Fortunately, I didn’t have them real close (together). My last year I had two, but they were like four games apart. That’s where you really worry. Sometimes it’s not just getting knocked out, it’s just slapping your head and knocking things around.

“The helmet-to-helmet, some of the rule things, using your helmet as a weapon, at least two of my concussions, with Dave Robinson and L.C. Greenwood, were helmet-to-helmet. L.C.’s, I actually had a lump under my helmet when I woke up.

“So they’re doing some good things and they still maintain the integrity of the game. They definitely are protecting the quarterback more. I don’t even remember having a roughing-the-passer penalty. A lot of these guys average two a game. These quarterbacks are a little more wussy than we were.”

Just so there’s no misunderstanding, this last was a wisecrack, said with a smile.

“But they’re doing the right things and it’s going down to college and into the high schools and kids,” he said. “My first concussion — I had one in high school, one in college and with the Cowboys I had about eight of ’em. They’re studying if they lead into other problems and there probably are some things they’re doing that are showing that . . . .

“Concussions definitely aren’t good and they are trying to benchmark them and keep you out of the game and make sure you’re back. They’re doing the right things, I think, now, versus — and I don’t think it was intentional in the past, I just think it was, ‘Hey, it’s just a concussion, no big deal.'”

Before Staubach’s visit to KOA ended, Dave Logan asked about the quarterbacks he liked to watch most after he retired.

“I think watching the game you just have that feeling when a guy steps on the field that he’s going to make things happen,” Staubach said. “If they’re behind, that some way he’s going to win that game. That’s when I feel real strong about a quarterback.

“I saw that when Dallas got (Troy) Aikman back in the ’90s. I think he was fantastic. But now, you watch Peyton Manning get out there, or Tom Brady. John Elway. I mean, John’s going to figure out a way to win the game.

“There’s a lot of quarterbacks that have that confidence. You’ve got to have the physical talent. You’ve got to throw with a little velocity because there’s not a weak guy on defense. But the big thing is having your teammates believe in you because you can’t do it by yourself. If you can transfer your ability to your teammates, getting their confidence, that’s the differentiator in the Elways and the Peyton Mannings and the Bradys.

“I think I was able to transfer my confidence to my teammates. The quarterback is more than just the physical. It’s the confidence, it’s the leadership, it’s being able to get your teammates to believe, ‘Hey, we’re going to figure out how to win this game.'”

Roger the Dodger ought to know.


The Rockies’ desperate gambit

No one can say for certain who originated the popular aphorism, “Desperate times call for desperate measures,” although it goes back at least to the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, referring to people who were desperately ill.

Yup, the same dude who wrote the Hippocratic Oath, the one promising to do no harm, which is perhaps an oath baseball managers should also take, not that they can help themselves.

The Hippocratic Oath, by the way, was sworn to Apollo, Greek god of the sun. Just saying.

Perhaps the most succinct form of the sentiment comes from the Latin: “extremis malis extrema remedia.” Google Translate turns this into “the evils of the remedies,” which brings us to the Rockies.

I probably don’t need to explain why these are desperate times for the Rocks. Their starting pitching is as bad as it has ever been, going all the way back to the pre-humidor days when baseball games in the thin air a mile above sea level produced football scores and Rockies fans prayed for late field goals when Dante Bichette or Vinny Castilla came to bat with a couple of men on base.

This season’s early injury to Jhoulys Chacin, last year’s winningest starter, certainly didn’t help. Neither did the unexplained regression of rookie Drew Pomeranz, prize of the Ubaldo Jimenez trade. Nor the continued setbacks during rehabilitation from Tommy John surgery of Jorge De La Rosa, who has yet to pitch an inning of big-league ball this season after blowing out his elbow a year ago. That’s three starters the Rocks hoped to have in their rotation by now, and none of them is.

But by far the biggest disappointment has been Jeremy Guthrie, acquired over the winter in what right now looks like one of the worst trades in club history. The Rocks exchanged inconsistent starter Jason Hammel and reliever Matt Lindstrom for Guthrie. In Hammel’s most recent outing for Baltimore, he threw a one-hit, complete-game shutout over the Braves to improve his record to 7-2 and his earned-run average to 2.87.

Frankly, no screams of anguish filled my inbox when general manager Dan O’Dowd traded him following a 7-13, 4.76 campaign for the Rocks last season, but in retrospect he has become Rockies fans’ all-time favorite pitcher. This is mostly because of Guthrie, who has been, in a word, horrendous.

Following his latest horror show — according to one Twitter wag, it is now the Rockies Horror Pitching Show, derived from the old camp classic, the Rocky Horror Picture Show — Guthrie was summoned to manager Jim Tracy’s office on Tuesday in Philadelphia and informed he was being dropped from the starting rotation. A record of 3-6 and an ERA of 7.02 will often have that effect.

Rather than replace Guthrie with the next in line of the usual suspects, Tracy made a startling announcement. For the time being, the Rocks will operate with a rotation of four starters, not five, and each will be limited to about 75 pitches per start, owing to the fact that each will be pitching next on three days of rest rather than four.

This, then, is the Rockies’ desperate measure.

I texted Tracy in Philly this morning to see if he’d like to talk about it and he replied with a friendly personal note that also included this:

“Not much to say about it. As you and I have discussed in the past, we play in a very unique place and we’re just trying something different and we’ll see where it goes.”

Let me say at the outset that in the abstract, I am almost always in favor of trying something different. Baseball in particular has a tendency toward Orwell’s groupthink that I find maddening. A pitcher throws an eight-inning shutout, completely dominant, and the manager pulls him in favor of his “closer” in the ninth, who promptly blows it. I mention this only because the Cubs do it about once a week, or nearly every time Ryan Dempster pitches. But I digress.

So, in the abstract, I love the idea the Rocks are doing something that makes baseball fans everywhere scratch their heads. I mean, seriously, why not? What, exactly, do they have to lose? They already have the worst pitching in the game.

Unfortunately, decisions in baseball, like decisions in pretty much every other sphere of human activity, are not made in the abstract. They are made in the particular, the practical, the concrete, not to bring up the playing surface of the Phillies stadium that preceded the current one.

So let’s examine the particulars of the Rockies’ new plan. It has two basic elements. One is the four-man rotation, as opposed to the conventional five. The other is the 75-pitch limit, as opposed to the conventional (and mostly unspoken) 100-125, depending on the pitcher and circumstances. (The Mets’ Johan Santana was permitted to throw 134 against the Cardinals on June 1, mostly because he was throwing a no-hitter, but he had to convince his manager to let him finish.)

Baseball’s transition from the four-man to the five-man starting rotation is, frankly, a bit mysterious. It happened during my lifetime. In a remarkably short space of time, every team followed, like a troop of Pavlovian dogs.

I recall as if it were yesterday the 1971 Orioles staff. Mike Cuellar started 38 games that year. Jim Palmer and Pat Dobson started 37 apiece. Dave McNally started but 30, owing, if I recall, to an injury of some kind. They comprised the last big-league pitching staff with four 20-game winners (McNally won 21).

Cuellar finished 21 of his 38 starts. Palmer was right behind him with 20 complete games. Dobson had 18; McNally, 11. Dave Leonhard, a reliever who got six spot starts, finished one of those.

The major-league leader in starts that year was the Tigers’ Mickey Lolich, with 45. Forty years later, 2011’s leaders, eight of them, started 34 games apiece.

What happened? Have pitchers grown more feeble? While football, basketball and hockey players grow ever bigger, stronger and more athletic, are baseball players shrinking into fragile flowers? Has evolution mistaken them for ballet dancers?

Or is it just that they make way more money today and the people who run ballclubs and pay the large guaranteed salaries are scared to death of destroying their massive investments through overuse?

That’s a column for another day. Suffice it to say for now that ample historical evidence demonstrates a four-man rotation is not beyond the physical capability of the human species. If one team out of thirty wants to give it a try, I say, more power to it.

(Unfortunately, the Rockies are probably the one team out of thirty for which this experiment is least advisable, owing to the additional stress on the arm of trying to make pitches break and move with less air resistance a mile above sea level, a phenomenon to which any number of hurlers has testified over the club’s twenty-year history. Again, a subject for another day.)

It is the second element of the Rocks’ desperate measure that throws me off the track into the tumbleweeds. The central problem posed by the club’s sorry starting pitching this season has been the burden on the bullpen, which already leads the National League in innings pitched.

Ineffective starters have had to come out of games early, leaving too much of the game to be pitched by relievers, which wears them out and leaves them less effective when the Rocks are actually ahead late in a game, as rare as that is these days. Rather than solve that problem, the new strategy gilds it into club policy.

If a starter must come out after 75 pitches no matter what, even when the Rocks get that rarest of all silver moonbeams, an effective start, that rare masterpiece will have to end prematurely and the bullpen will have to be called upon, even if, for a change, it isn’t really needed.

The problem here is one of simple arithmetic. When Tracy moved Guthrie to the bullpen, he designated him one of two “long” relievers — the sort that comes into a game early when the starter comes out early. The other long man in the Rocks’ bullpen is Guillermo Moscoso.

So, when Tracy pulled starter Josh Outman on Day 1 of the experiment at 72 pitches with one out in the fifth inning, he called on Moscoso, who came on to finish the fifth and pitch the sixth, acting as a bridge to the (these days) normal bullpen innings — the seventh, eighth and (if necessary) ninth. This evening, one assumes, when Tracy pulls Alex White after 75 pitches, it will be Guthrie who serves as the bridge.

And what about tomorrow? Moscoso again? Are the two long men now sentenced to pitch multiple innings every other day? Does that sound like a good idea?

Maybe the Rocks are counting on occasionally getting a really efficient start in which 75 pitches get them into the sixth and no long man is required. But in the case of such a start, why the heck would you want to remove a guy pitching so efficiently? To follow some pre-ordained plan that makes no allowance for the common-sense notion that, Hey, this dude is pitching really well! Leave him alone!

The more pitchers you use in a game, the more likely you are to use one who is ineffective that particular day. If you have a system that guarantees you’re going to use four or five every single day, the chances at least one will blow up are pretty good.

Take Tuesday, Day 1 of the experiment. Adam Ottavino has been one of the Rockies’ best relievers this season. But he happened not to have it Tuesday. The third pitcher in, he gave up three runs in one inning of work. A 4-2 deficit became a 7-2 deficit. Game over.

The last time a baseball club decided the solution to its problems lay in a committee, it was the Cubs and their college of coaches in 1961 and ’62. The manager’s job rotated among seven coaches, every one of whom had a losing record. That will be the column’s final Cubs reference. Promise.

Common sense in baseball has always suggested this: When a pitcher is going well, leave him in there. When a pitcher is going badly, take him out. All sorts of “innovations” have worked against this simple principle. Managers routinely remove pitchers now simply because they throw with the wrong arm. A left-handed batter is coming up, therefore the right-handed reliever throwing well must come out and a left-handed reliever must come on. A pitcher throwing well must come out because his turn in the lineup is coming up (National League). And so on.

In short, the fewer arbitrary rules a team has, the more likely it is to follow common sense and allow effective pitchers to keep pitching. This should be the goal.

So, what’s the alternative for the Rocks, a team in admittedly dire straits? Well, I’m sorry to say, it’s not experimental and it’s not innovative. Sometimes the simplest solution is also the right one.

Moscoso, a 28-year-old right hander from Venezuela, started 21 games for Oakland last season, finishing with a record of 8-10 and an ERA of 3.38. When the Rocks obtained him and Outman from the A’s in exchange for Seth Smith last winter, they envisioned him as a candidate for the starting rotation. Unfortunately, Moscoso was terrible in spring training and about as bad during a brief (two starts) major-league audition. A demotion back to the minor leagues followed.

Since his return in early June, he’s been getting progressively better. Including his stint in relief of Outman on Tuesday, he has now pitched 6 2/3 consecutive scoreless innings in three relief appearances. He has earned another chance to start.

With youngsters Pomeranz and Tyler Chatwood trying to get their acts together in the minor leagues and Chacin, De La Rosa and Juan Nicasio working their way back from injuries, this need not be a permanent solution. But for now, it is the obvious one: Add Moscoso to the rotation as the fifth starter, replacing Guthrie. Trade Guthrie, a mental casualty of Coors Field, as soon as possible.

That leaves a starting rotation of White, Moscoso, Outman, Jeff Francis and Christian Friedrich. If, by some miracle, one of them pitches a really good game, Tracy can leave him in there to pitch as far as he can rather than remove him for no good reason because he’s hit an arbitrary pitch limit.

And if none of them ever does, well, the Rocks are right back to where they are now, ringing that bullpen phone too early.

I empathize with Tracy’s plight. And I admire his willingness to try something different in a league where groupthink often appears to be the only thinking going on. But sometimes, when you wrestle with a problem too long, you can just out-think yourself.

At times like those, it’s sometimes a good idea to take a break and pop in a DVD of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.

“You just keep thinking, Butch,” says Sundance. “That’s what you’re good at.”


Collateral Damage: Why Mullen administrators tried to discredit Dave Logan

 
“There are no allegations and we’re not doing any followup or investigation of Dave Logan at this time.”

 — Paul Angelico, commissioner, Colorado High School Activities Association

June 11, 2012

“Football violations at Mullen,” said the banner headline in the print edition of the Denver Post on Jan. 19, 2012. No question mark. No attribution. A simple statement of fact. Football violations at Mullen. You know, the school that won four state championships in the past nine years under coach Dave Logan, former NFL player and current voice of the Broncos.

The Post managed a qualifier in the sub-head, but it also got in Logan’s name, so let’s call the lower deck a wash on the sensationalism meter. “The recruiting errors were allegedly made by the staff of former coach Dave Logan.”

Nearly five months later, the main headline, “Football violations at Mullen” has yet to be substantiated. About all the Colorado High School Activities Association has documented to date is a breach of protocol by Mullen administrators. Despite twice leaking allegations against Logan’s program to the media, Mullen still hasn’t been specific enough in its reporting to CHSAA to trigger the governing body’s remedial process. The longer this goes on, the more it looks as if Mullen’s charges were intended more for the media than the governing body.

After Mullen’s latest fusillade turned up on the Post web site before its arrival at CHSAA headquarters, CHSAA commissioner Paul Angelico took the unusual step of making the statement quoted above when I spoke with him Monday.

Under any reasonable standard of integrity or fairness, it should not be possible to make unsubstantiated allegations, leak them to the media, then force the target of your attack to sit in limbo while you refuse to be specific enough to permit an investigation. Angelico’s statement makes it clear where CHSAA’s focus lies after Mullen turned it into a stage prop for a public relations campaign against its former coach.

Amid all this stagecraft, you might not remember that Logan was fired in January for reasons unrelated to these retrospective charges, at least as Mullen CEO Ryan Clement explained it to 850 KOA’s Colorado Morning News the following day.

But Clement’s original explanation didn’t fly with many students, parents and alumni. He and principal Jim Gmelich, on the job less than a year, were blowing up the best high school football program in the state for no apparent reason. With a petition circulating among students that called for Clement and Gmelich to resign, the Mullen administrators decided to cast Logan as Barry Switzer. It was desperate, sure, but at that point, what did they have to lose?

More than four months after their initial report, with no effect except Logan’s move to Cherry Creek High School later in January, Mullen gave it another try. Again, it found a willing partner in the Post, which wrote, in the lead paragraph of another front page story, “The storied football program at Denver’s Mullen High School was spinning out of control under then-coach Dave Logan, with lax oversight by an administration that has since taken corrective steps, according to a review commissioned by the school.”

How convenient, as the Church Lady used to say, that Clement and Gmelich had arrived just recently enough to throw both Logan and the previous administration under the bus while taking credit for the “corrective steps” themselves. The Post seemed happily oblivious to any possible ulterior motive.

In fact, the declaration that the vaguely-described violations cited in the report’s summary amounted to “spinning out of control” didn’t pass the laugh test, as the comments section attached to the story demonstrated.

On the other hand, it was the most-viewed story of the day on denverpost.com, which was perhaps the article’s most important attribute.

What follows is a longer look at this story. So far, the narrative has suggested the world was spinning merrily along and suddenly Logan got fired. In fact, the story begins nearly a year earlier, when Clement became Mullen’s new president. Twenty years Logan’s junior and a former Mullen football star, Clement made it clear from the beginning that he wanted influence over the football program, which should not have been that surprising, given his background.

For his part, Logan had done pretty well without administrative interference, winning six championships in the state’s highest classification at three different schools, something no other high school coach in the country has done. He wanted to be co-operative, as we’ll see, but he was not going to surrender control of his staff.

Like a lot of parochial schools, Mullen is struggling. Its enrollment has fallen from over 1,000 to about 800 as of the 2011-2012 school year. It is expected to fall again in the coming school year, a predicament aggravated by a wave of more than 150 student transfers out of Mullen over the past nine months.

Seeking to stem this downward spiral, the school commissioned a consultant to examine the problem. The consultant reported that Logan’s success had given Mullen, originally a Lasallian school for orphaned boys, the reputation of a football school. To the extent that its football reputation obscured its academic and religious aspects, it might be hurting enrollment, especially by students able to pay the full tuition, the consultant reported.

Thinking he could develop a stronger working relationship with Clement by helping to address the school’s financial problems, Logan introduced the young school president to an old Wheat Ridge High School classmate with experience helping academic institutions and other non-profits with development and fundraising. That is where our story begins . . .

The advisor

Charles L. Griffith is a successful business executive who has run Fortune 500 and equivalent firms, served on over a dozen public and private corporate boards and done pro bono work for numerous not-for-profit and educational institutions, including Kent Denver School, Columbia University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Colorado Leeds Business School and the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. He was also Dave Logan’s schoolmate at Wheat Ridge High back in the day.

In the summer of 2011, as Ryan Clement settled into his new job as president and chief executive officer of Mullen High School, Logan asked Griffith to meet with Clement to see if he could help with some of the challenges Mullen was facing — mostly in the areas of fundraising and declining enrollment. Logan thought Griffith’s work as a trustee and head of the annual fund at Kent Denver might be particularly helpful, Kent Denver being known for its fundraising prowess and financial stability.

Griffith met with Clement and Logan at an introductory breakfast on July 29 and subsequently held a marathon session with Clement and principal Jim Gmelich to discuss in detail the issues facing Mullen. He did this, like his other work with educational institutions, on a pro bono (no fee) basis. Following the introductory meeting, the parties agreed to keep certain information exchanged in subsequent meetings confidential. When I spoke with Griffith, he declined to discuss information of a proprietary nature but agreed to discuss subjects raised at the initial breakfast, subjects already in the public domain and his general observations of the situation.

“Ryan was fairly open right away about the issues he was facing at Mullen,” Griffith recalled. “He talked about the challenges they had raising money and, in particular, with enrollment figures down and the number of full-paying students dropping off. Essentially, he said that he had some real financial challenges. He also mentioned at that first breakfast that he was looking for a head of finance, either a CFO (chief financial officer) or a director of finance, and we assisted them with that.”

Clement gave Griffith early indications that he felt Logan’s successful football program and high community profile were not helping him deal with the problems Mullen faced in other areas.

“That first meeting, Dave is sitting there, and Ryan says, ‘You know, it’s not the easiest thing to have a legend, a larger-than-life figure, as your football coach.’ And he kind of chuckled. He said while he understood Dave had a staff and had confidence in his staff, he wished that he would be able to have more of his teachers be assistant coaches. He did mention that early on. He also indicated he’d like to be an assistant coach,” Griffith said.

“The only reason I got together with Ryan Clement, the only reason I spent any time with him, was because Dave Logan asked me to. Dave wanted me to get together with him because he cared deeply about Mullen, he was genuinely concerned about them, and he thought anything I could do to help Ryan and Mullen would be useful.

“Dave and I had talked in previous discussions about a workshop that I held a couple of months prior to this with many of the heads of independent schools in the state except parochial schools. It was at the invitation of (Kent Denver Head of School) Todd Horn on behalf of probably thirty independent schools that are part of the Association of Colorado Independent Schools (ACIS).

“Todd Horn also happened to be the president of the overall group at that time. I’d done a workshop for the (Kent Denver) trustees and he asked me to do a similar workshop on long-term strategy, surviving the economy and how school administrators and leaders can best identify and deliver value to their constituencies — students, parents, alumni, their board and others — both as an independent entity and vis-a-vis other schools,” Griffith said.

“So part of the discussion with Ryan later was around a process he might go through to determine priorities, how best to meet the needs of the schools’ constituencies, and how to position Mullen versus other schools, including religious schools such as Regis and Valor Christian.”

In addition to emerging differences over the composition of Logan’s coaching staff, Griffith got the impression at least two other aspects of the football program troubled Clement. One was the relative success of the Mullen End Zone Club, the football boosters, at raising money for the football program while Mullen’s general fund-raising arm, the Mullen Foundation, had been less effective. The other was the number of football players who paid less than Mullen’s full tuition at a time when increasing revenue was a priority. Athletic scholarships are not permitted in high school, but tuition can be adjusted on the basis of financial need.

With respect to the money raised by the booster club, Griffith said Logan offered to make it more widely available to help fund other Mullen sports programs.

“I remember Dave saying at breakfast, ‘Ryan, as I’ve mentioned before, if this is what we think will help Mullen, I’m prepared to discuss with the booster club control of that money,'” Griffith recalled.

Griffith came away with several impressions:

1. At 35 (now 36), Clement was a new and inexperienced educational administrator and CEO faced with problems that more experienced administrators would find challenging.

2. As a former football star at the school, football was one area where he felt comfortable, even enthusiastic, about exerting his influence, but he had a local legend twenty years his senior standing in the way.

3. With issues at Mullen historically common to other parochial schools, including declining enrollment and financial challenges, Clement appeared to believe that the success of Logan’s football program was overshadowing the school’s academic reputation, something important to the future enrollment of full tuition payers.

“It started with the whole idea that they have these background tuition and  financial challenges, of a multi-layered governance and political structure, and Ryan as a new professional educator trying to establish himself,” Griffith said.

“And then you’ve got a feeling that he loves football and he wanted to have more control over the football program. And he’s got this 57-year-old legend who has strong points of view, particularly about assistant coaches, which is where Ryan wants to fiddle. On money, Dave was the ultimate team player, in my opinion.

“But when it comes to firing assistant coaches and bringing somebody on that Ryan is dictating or Gmelich is dictating, that’s a different issue, particularly if you approach it as, ‘This is something you’ve got to do,’ rather than, ‘Dave, let’s have a discussion to see if there might be an opportunity to move people on over time. Obviously, it would have to meet both your and our standards, it would have to work for you, so perhaps that means working together in the next two to three seasons to place some of these other coaches in schools that they’ll be happy with.’

“I think Dave Logan probably understands that there’s the potential that if one of the reasons Ryan Clement or some of his teachers got into teaching or education was also to coach, and they’re at Mullen, that creates a problem for Ryan Clement.  I think that contributed to the change. They couldn’t get what they wanted and they wanted it now. They didn’t want to work on it over time.”

So, I asked Griffith, why not fire Logan, take the public relations hit, and move on? Why the retrospective attempt to paint Logan’s as a rogue program?

“I suspect the reason he abandoned the high road so early is he didn’t anticipate the amount of negative feedback to the decision from students, parents, alumni and the general public,” Griffith said of Clement. “He’s inexperienced. He couldn’t stand the heat.”

The parent

Kairos is an ancient Greek word roughly meaning the right or opportune moment. At Mullen, it is defined as “the Lord’s time” and is the name given to four annual retreats for juniors — two for girls and two for boys — at the Ponderosa Retreat and Conference Center in Larkspur.

Todd Reynolds is the father of two Mullen graduates and a former president of the End Zone Club, the football boosters. He was an adult leader on one of the Kairos retreats during the 2010-11 school year. After school let out last spring, Mullen held a dinner followup meeting for some of the adult leaders, teachers and administrators involved with the program. Wine was served with dinner. Reynolds and Ryan Clement were there, and the conversation turned to Dave Logan’s football program.

“The football program comes up and it kind of started out, one of the teachers was complaining about some of the players hanging out down in the football offices over in the Spirit Center watching ESPN and they needed to be in class and they weren’t doing that well in her class,” Reynolds recalled.

“And I said, ‘Hey, wait just a minute. Listen, you guys are the adults. You can go down there and get your kids back in class anytime you want. Why are you blaming it on these guys? Go down there and make them get their butts back in class.’

“So we kind of went around the table a little bit on that. And then I was talking to Ryan independently. This was after several glasses of wine, and we started talking football. And the first thing he said was, ‘Hey, back when I was there, we won state championships. We don’t need a Dave Logan to win state championships. We can win those.’

“And I’m like, ‘Really?’ I said, ‘No offense, Ryan, but you guys weren’t very good. You were pretty good (individually), but as a team, you guys weren’t very good.’

“I don’t think they even won a state championship, honestly, when Ryan went there. They might have; I don’t remember. I just basically said, ‘You guys weren’t very good. I mean, we win, this group wins consecutive championships. We have a heck of a program.'”

Clement was a four-year starter at quarterback for Mullen from 1990-94 and won the Denver Post’s Gold Helmet Award as a senior (as Logan did at Wheat Ridge High a generation earlier). Mullen won state championships in boys’ track and field and girls’ cross country during that period, but not in football. Mullen has won eight state football championships since its founding in 1928 — 1978, 1979, 1980, 1998, 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2010. The first three were in Class 3A; the last five in Class 5A. Logan was coach for half of them, the last four.

“Ryan said, ‘We don’t need Dave. He’s got all those trophies down there in his office. Those belong up in the school,'” Reynolds recounted. “And I said, ‘Ryan, go down and get ’em! Move ’em up in the school. It’s the same thing back with the kids. You guys are the adults. If you want ’em, go get ’em.’

“Really, the bottom line is, I think that whole administration was just a little intimidated. There was nothing wrong with the way that football program was run. I was there four years and it worked, and it worked very well. It goes back to when Dave wouldn’t hire him as quarterbacks coach. That’s what it’s about, in my opinion.”

I asked Reynolds if he came away from that dinner in the summer of 2011 believing Clement had already decided to make changes in the football program.

“I really did,” Reynolds said. “I was uncomfortable because I felt like something was going to happen. They were going to do something. I didn’t know what; I didn’t know that it would be the firing of Dave. I knew there were going to be changes, probably either within his staff or they were going to force him to make some changes. It was uncomfortable. You could kind of see where it was going.”

The tone from Clement, Reynolds said, was dramatically different from the tone he’d gotten from Mullen’s previous president, Robert Regan.

“He always kind of held up the football program as an example of our school — the excellence and success that we had in football,” Reynolds said of Regan. “He wanted to get everything else, the community service and the academics, up to the football level. Because we were good. We had a very good program. And we were successful. He praised the program and praised Dave in a couple of meetings I was at. That we ought to all be like Dave Logan — all of our programs ought to be run like that. All of our coaches ought to be like that. So he kind of held him up as the standard.”

Reynolds also knew Clement from earlier dealings.

“Two years ago, they brought him on to head up the alumni association, kind of his first position back at Mullen,” Reynolds said. “And he failed at that miserably. He couldn’t get that thing kicked off. I had some interaction with him because he wanted to do some alumni things with the football program and I was president for three years of the End Zone Club. So I had some dealings with him. It was off and on. He didn’t ever get that thing really kicked off, and the next thing you know he’s in there as interim president and then he becomes our full-time president.”

In the end, Reynolds believes the conflict over the football program came down to ego.

“I think there’s a problem with Ryan with Dave and just this whole ego thing,” he said. “I think it stems from that, quite frankly. Last summer, he was already talking about it. Just being involved with the program for four years, you could see where he was going. I mean, he was going to make some changes.”

The governing body

The Colorado High School Activities Association operates out of modest offices in Aurora. It has seven full-time employees. They hold an umbrella of rules and bylaws over 120,000 high school athletes in 7,000-8,000 programs. The NCAA it is not. There is no army of field investigators.

CHSAA’s process for enforcing the rules that govern high school sports is a simple one. It relies on member schools to do the right thing. And it relies on them to do it privately.

“Our process is this: A school has an issue, or a parent or somebody determines the school has an issue, and they turn it into us,” said CHSAA commissioner Paul Angelico.

“We’re a self-reporting organization. So we go to the school and say, ‘It appears you may have an issue. Do a self-investigation and let us know what you find.’

“That’s expected to be sent to us in this form: ‘In our investigation we found that we violated bylaw 2232.1’ — I’m just throwing out numbers here — ‘on recruiting, because of . . . ‘ and they list off what happened. And we send them a letter back saying, ‘OK, thank you for finding that out, your school’s on restriction, what are you going to do?’

“But really, the focus of this letter is to determine what you’re going to do to ensure that this situation doesn’t happen again. They put a plan together. They write it back to us, we accept it or reject it. If we accept it, we take them off of restriction, put them on probation and life goes on. And all this happens in a couple weeks, typically.”

Why aren’t there more frantic newspaper headlines blaring about this or that high school sports rules violation? Because all of this happens privately, hundreds of times a year.

“Nobody ever knows all this stuff happens,” Angelico said. “Once it’s all happened, then a school typically will tell their public, ‘Hey, we’re on probation but we’re off of restriction.’ We’ve got a football team up north that’s been on restriction that didn’t get taken off last year. Nobody knows about it. We don’t ever report to the public what we’re doing because these get tangled up into personnel issues as well and they’re not our employees. So we just don’t, as a matter of course, publicize all this stuff.

“In the case of Regis a couple years ago, suddenly their coach was not coaching on the sideline of a football game. People started asking questions. I don’t know how much they told the public, but basically they said, ‘Yeah, you’re right, you’re not seeing him because we have an issue with CHSAA and we’re solving that. That’s part of his penalty.’ So that’s what typically brings that to light and how the public typically knows.”

Mullen turned this process on its head by making charges against the coaching staff it had just fired and leaking them to the Post at the outset. According to multiple sources present at Mullen’s final faculty meeting of the school year on Friday, June 1 — the day the Post’s breathless “spinning out of control” story was posted — Gmelich announced the report would be submitted to the media and instructed faculty members on what to say if they were asked about it.

One teacher raised her hand and asked whether this was something that really needed to be submitted to the media. Mullen gets so much bad press, she said, do we really need to be bringing more attention to ourselves?

Gmelich replied solemnly that the school had a duty to be accountable to the public.

Many teachers were perplexed. They had first heard of this back in January, when Mullen administrators first leaked allegations of recruiting violations against the coaching staff they had fired just a week before. They assumed it would go through the normal, confidential CHSAA process. Why was it coming back up, and in such a public way?

“All of us feel like we’re throwing ourselves under the bus by doing this,” said one faculty member. “That seemed to be the general feeling. Like, ‘Do you really need to drag us through the mud again?'”

“When this broke in January, it was tough on all of us,” said another. “Dave had done a great job here for a long time, and not just winning championships. He impacted those kids and others. But changing coaches happens and while it was tough for a while, everybody had pretty much moved on.

“We couldn’t understand why (it came back up). Hadn’t we answered enough questions? Folks were upset because they couldn’t understand what positive for our school would come out of it.”

Mullen’s public relations campaign also put CHSAA in a bind. The organization couldn’t very well publicly rebuke the school for going public without getting into a pot-kettle problem.

On the other hand, Mullen’s public campaign and CHSAA’s reticence put Logan in a tough position. The Post’s hyperbolic allegations were all over the place and even if Logan knew the allegations were baseless, he was powerless to stop the smear campaign other than to call it that, which he did when local television stations sent reporters to KOA headquarters to get his reaction.

When I mentioned this imbalance to Angelico — that Mullen had made its charges publicly, but CHSAA would make its findings privately — he said he had no problem stating for the record that CHSAA is not investigating Logan for anything. He gave me the statement at the top of this report, and added:

“Dave Logan is not being investigated by this office and/or Cherry Creek High School, and at this point I have no concerns about Dave or what’s going on over there.”

Mullen and its administrators are a different story. Angelico declines to discuss his communications with the school’s administrators, but, as Doug Ottewill first reported in Mile High Sports, Mullen still hasn’t made a report to CHSAA in the form it requires. The report it leaked, prepared by its own lawyers, alleges issues in the areas of player recruitment, misrepresentations about tuition obligations and unauthorized fundraising, but nowhere does it mention specific people or specific bylaws violated. Without such specifics, CHSAA has nothing to act on.

Indeed, sources in Denver’s high school sports community say CHSAA was livid over Mullen’s attempt to use it as a prop in a public relations campaign against its former staff and warned the school privately that it was Mullen’s competitive status that was in question, not that of Logan or his staff, until the school agreed to comply with CHSAA procedures, including the restoration of confidentiality and specificity to its self-reporting.

Angelico declined to comment on those reports, but he did make it clear the ball is currently in Mullen’s court, not CHSAA’s.

“I guess what I’d like to say is I want to see the whole situation be addressed quickly and as normally as possible in terms of, it should be handled the same as all of these kinds of cases. This should not be treated any differently than the hundreds of other ones that we deal with every year.

“I understand that Dave is a high-profile guy and there will be a whole lot more interest in it, but this office is going to have to take the same approach, that it’s between us and the school and it’s up to the school to inform their public after it’s all said and done, after everything is worked out, what they’re planning on doing. It’s really in the school’s court.”

The interview 

Dave Logan was dismissed after nine seasons as Mullen’s head football coach on Jan. 11. The news was greeted with anger and confusion among many Mullen students, parents and alumni. As Mullen was winning three consecutive state championships from 2008-10, Logan was winning thousands of loyalists, many of whom were stunned by the announcement that he was out.

As talk of a student walkout circulated, Clement began giving interviews in an attempt to put out the fire. One was on 850 KOA’s Colorado Morning News on Jan. 12, the day after the announcement. What follows is a transcript of that interview. Only extraneous conversation has been deleted. You can listen to the interview in its entirety here.

April Zesbaugh: We’ve heard the words “released,” “dismissed,” “parted ways.” Was this a firing?

Ryan Clement: After lengthy discussions, both coach Logan and the administration here felt it was in both of our best interests that he not return next season. 

Steffan Tubbs: And why is that?

Clement: Coach has a great number of demands on his time outside of Mullen football, including his obligations to the Broncos and various media outlets as well as other entrepreneurial ventures. At the same time, we felt we needed a football coach who was a full-time member of the faculty and the school environment. And so, after discussion, we both felt it was in everyone’s interest that we try to accomplish those goals.

Tubbs: You mentioned the tenure — nine years. Dave’s schedule, at least in my opinion, has not changed that much. He’s been on Channel 9, he has a show here on KOA. So it seems like it’s not just the fact that he hasn’t been able to commit 100 percent to Mullen.

Clement: In our analysis, since we got here, and, you know, schools and other businesses go through an analysis of everything that you do on a daily basis, trying to get better in every aspect, organizationally and otherwise. Part of the issue, certainly, when we looked at the very visible and high-profile position of our head football coach, was obviously the demands on coach Logan’s time, but what would be in the best interests in the school, to have a full-time person in that position. And that was the analysis that we addressed. And these were conversations and analysis that took place over the course of many, many months. It was not a decision that was arrived at lightly.

Zesbaugh: You’ve got your winningest coach ever that you’ve let go from your program. Certainly it’s going to have tongues wagging this morning. Can you put the kibosh on any rumors that there was an ethical violation going on?

Clement: Absolutely not. One hundred percent, not even close. Coach Logan is certainly a man of great integrity and we have the utmost respect for him and for the success that he brought to the school will always be a legacy that will be part of Mullen.

Tubbs: When it comes to high school football, especially over the last decade, arguably there’s no better program than Mullen High School football. What do you say to those parents that are driving into school, maybe some of them taking their kids to school this morning, they’re paying the high tuition, they are supporters, maybe they contribute financially to the program, what do you say to those parents? And then obviously the followup would be, what do you say to the kids who, in about seven minutes, some of them say they’re going to plan a walkout.

Clement: I say that from both perspectives I completely understand. I was a football player here at Mullen myself. My head coach was let go my senior year. But I came here to go to Mullen High School because it was a values-based education that I knew that I was going to get from the Christian brothers, and I certainly did. And I owe my coach a lot from the time I was here. And then as I moved on to the University of Miami, I was recruited by Dennis Erickson and he moved on to the Seattle Seahawks and Butch Davis came in. Coaching changes happen and they are unfortunate and I totally understand where they’re coming from because I understand the feeling completely, 100 percent. It’s painful in my role and the roles of administrators and people who have to take into consideration not just the football program but the entirety of the school community. It’s unfortunate, obviously, when these things happen, but that’s what I would say to them.

Zesbaugh: What does the firing mean to the program, and, bigger than that, mean to the school as far as donations and as far as parents wanting their kids to go there and pay the tuition?

Clement: Without question, all those things were taken into our analysis before we had the initial discussions with coach about these issues. So we feel like we’re in a good position moving forward. We’re excited about the future of Mullen football. This is a wonderful job and the next person who comes here will be a full-time staff member and we’re just really thrilled and excited to be taking our next steps to find that person.

Tubbs: Just wrapping this whole thing up, I can only imagine that there are at least a few people out there going, “It still doesn’t make sense. What? He was there for so long.” The bottom line is Dave’s schedule and not being able to give 100 percent commitment to Mullen and that is it, there’s nothing else?

Clement: Someone wrote very recently that culture’s not something, it is the thing. And having the position, especially at Mullen High School, the head football coach, it’s paramount, it’s imperative, that that person be here on a full-time basis.

Zesbaugh: You mentioned values and culture a couple of times. Dave Logan’s values and culture were in line with the school’s, right?

Clement: Yes.

Logan’s response was to say he was disappointed but respected the right of any school to change coaches. Football coaches, he observed on the radio, get fired all the time. Schools don’t need a reason. He urged unhappy Mullen students, players, parents and alumni to calm down. He repeatedly said Mullen would be fine, and so would he.

“They don’t have a reason,” senior wide receiver Guy Johnson told the Post. “I read their statement, and they didn’t give a good reason.”

Five days after the announcement, a petition demanding the ouster of Clement and Gmelich had attracted 550 signatures. The new Mullen administrators had a full-fledged public relations disaster on their hands.

It was at that point, at a meeting with angry parents one week after the announcement, that Clement first darkly suggested recruiting violations by Logan and his staff. He offered no specifics but the Post ran the uncorroborated story under that front page banner headline: “Football violations at Mullen.”

This new narrative — that administrators were riding to the rescue following the ouster of a rogue coach — had some trouble getting off the ground. All Mullen offered at first was the suggestion that two eighth-graders had stood on the sideline during a game and there might be unspecified other violations. If you’ve ever attended a high school football game, you’re probably aware that sideline security is not exactly up to NFL standards. CHSAA did nothing, awaiting more specifics from Mullen. It is still waiting.

The former president

Robert A. Regan is president of the Urban College of Boston. He was the president and CEO of Mullen High School immediately preceding Ryan Clement. He has also worked for Northeastern University, the Boston Public Schools and the New England College of Finance.

When Regan heard about the allegations against Dave Logan’s football program by his successors at Mullen, he wrote an open letter. That letter is reproduced in its entirety in a separate blog post immediately below this report. The portion of the letter pertaining to Logan is reproduced here:

“From the outset, I was extremely impressed with Dave Logan and the school’s football program. Aside from the several state championships under Dave’s leadership, I was proud of the way Dave managed the program. From my perspective his team was disciplined, totally prepared, totally buttoned up at all times, supportive of each other, and behaved in a manner that brought pride and positive recognition to the school. In fact, I remember receiving an unsolicited letter from a team photographer saying that she had worked with many schools and colleges in Colorado, and the Mullen football team was the most gracious and respectful group of young athletes she had ever dealt with. This was clearly a tribute to the values instilled by Dave and his coaches. As an educator, it was also my distinct feeling that Dave Logan and his coaches took a holistic approach to their coaching responsibilities and focused thoughtfully on youth development, team work, school pride and classroom performance – and not just winning games. I also felt that Dave’s prestige in the Denver community was a powerful asset for the school. Dave himself was generous in offering his personal support and urged me to take greater advantage of the opportunity to engage him in promoting the school to the larger Denver community. And so I did. Dave joined me on two occasions to meet with the President of the Mullen Foundation and helped us secure the largest gift during my presidency – a pledge of $175,000.

“Dave and I did not agree on all matters and on a few occasions had difficult conversations regarding school policy and disciplinary actions. But I never for a moment doubted his commitment to the school and its Lasallian values, or his respect for my leadership. He spoke his peace privately and articulately, and then moved on as a responsible member of the Mullen community. It saddens me to learn of the current accusations against the Mullen football program under Dave’s leadership. As President, I was not aware of any ethical breaches and truly believe that Dave is a person of great integrity, and a tremendous asset to any school. I know the families and players would agree with me.”

The newspaper

According to the Denver Post web site, the story headlined “Mullen reports possible violations during tenure of coach Dave Logan” was posted at 1:57 p.m. on June 1. The voicemail on Logan’s cell phone requesting his side of the story arrived at 2:23. An email containing a similar request arrived at 2:34.

Keep that in mind as we deconstruct the story of a struggling private school and a struggling newspaper co-operating to direct and publicize a series of unsubstantiated allegations at Logan over the past five months. The most basic tenet of fair-minded reporting is to get both sides of the story. In this case, the Post did not do so until after publishing its initial, one-sided account. It did lift quotes from a Logan television interview and inserted them into its story subsequently.

Rather than get both sides of the story, weigh the credibility of each and then synthesize them into a balanced report, the paper accepted uncritically a report furnished by the top administrators at Mullen High School attacking their own football program. By the next morning, the headline read: “Report: Mullen football program was out of control under Dave Logan.”

In order to increase the impact of its scoop, the Post melodramatically overstated the significance of vague, unsubstantiated allegations with the phrase “spinning out of control,” conjuring images of outlaw college football programs.

“I would like to get your response to our report on Mullen High School alerting CHSAA to potential rule violation [sic] in the football program,” reporter Eric Gorski wrote in the email that arrived more than half an hour after the story was posted. As if to document the post facto nature of his inquiry, Gorski kindly included a link to the already-published hit piece.

“Isn’t it standard procedure to ask for a response to a particular story before you post it?” Logan asked by return email at 3:48. “Your e-mail and phone call were 30+mins. after you posted your story.”

“In an ideal situation we are able to make all the phone calls before publishing,” Gorski replied at 4:56. “But it is not unusual for us to post a competitive story and then update it as we get responses. Had you been called out by name in the report, we would have sought your input before publishing.”

So there we have the Post’s rationale for failing to perform the most basic task in reporting: This was not really about Logan. The report prepared by Mullen’s lawyers darkly suggested misbehavior by unnamed assistant coaches, but never by Logan himself.

Of course, the report Gorski authored was all about Logan. It was Logan’s name in the headline, Logan’s program allegedly “spinning out of control.” By the next day, it was Logan’s photograph accompanying the front-page story in the print edition. And yet, Gorski’s thin rationalization for failing to seek his side of the story prior to publication was that the leaked report from Mullen didn’t name him. In fact, it didn’t appear to name anybody.

There is no indication anywhere that this was a “competitive” story. To the contrary, there are plenty of indications of a co-operative arrangement between Mullen and the Post. At Mullen’s final faculty meeting of the year, Gmelich not only told his staff he was releasing the report to the media. He also countered suggestions that he was damaging the school’s public image by telling teachers that if they’d noticed a reporter or photographer at the school recently, they were there preparing a “positive” piece for the Post on all the good things Mullen was up to. It would be appearing soon, he said.

It is no secret that the Post, like Mullen, is struggling financially. It has reduced its staff substantially over the past year with a series of buyouts and layoffs. It recently made national news by announcing plans to drop two-thirds of its copy editors. As advertising revenues from the print product decline, the Post, like many other metropolitan newspapers, is trying to make the transition to the digital age. The emphasis now is to get stories up on the web as quickly as possible. They can be revised and updated later.

Still, it is fair to ask whether the immediacy of the digital revolution justifies posting one-sided, sensationalized stories in the name of attracting the eyeballs that might one day generate enough digital advertising revenue to support a local news-gathering operation. Is it enough to tell Logan that the Post has the right to muddy his reputation in the name of its own survival?

There has been a striking difference between the credulous tone of Gorski’s sensational front-page reports and those of veteran Post prep sports writer Neil Devlin back in the sports section. Four days after Mullen fired Logan, Devlin wrote that the deed left “a nasty odor”:

“While Clement denies our report that he and others from the school were going to be required to be part of Logan’s staff, others inside or close to the school can only laugh. Multiple sources close to the program told us the same thing, that Mullen wanted full-time faculty members on Logan’s staff,” Devlin wrote.

“This is what it has come to — rolling the dice about who’s telling the truth or running their mouths.

“So much for the educational experience.”

Gorski’s big June 1 scoop had a decidedly different tone:

“The storied football program at Denver’s Mullen High School was spinning out of control under then-coach Dave Logan, with lax oversight by an administration that has since taken corrective steps, according to a review commissioned by the school.

“The Catholic college-preparatory school on Friday alerted the Colorado High School Activities Association of several possible rules violations that took place on Logan’s watch, said sources familiar with a Mullen briefing to staff and others.

“Among the potentially problematic issues: improper player recruitment, misrepresentations about tuition obligations and unauthorized fundraising.

“The potential transgressions involve assistant coaches during Logan’s nine-year tenure at Mullen, which included a run of four state championships and ended with his firing in January.

“Logan was not mentioned in the briefing as being directly connected to the possible violations, the sources said.”

Most newspapers, including the Post, have strict rules about quoting anonymous sources. Generally, they must provide information that can be acquired no other way and they must have a legitimate reason for requesting anonymity. For example, teachers at Mullen’s final faculty meeting who reported what went on there requested anonymity because they feared retribution. At the Post, the use of anonymous sources is supposed to be authorized by the editor or managing editor.

In this case, giving Mullen’s administrators the cover of anonymity smacks of an unholy alliance, especially after Gmelich announced to a roomful of people he was releasing the report to the media. By attributing its copy to anonymous sources and labeling its report a “Denver Post investigation,” the Post created the illusion of investigative reporting. In fact, there was no sign of any independent investigation. The paper simply became the vehicle for a public relations campaign by Mullen’s administrators.

However, if eyeballs were the objective, the Post succeeded. Gorski’s June 1 piece was the most-viewed story on denverpost.com that day, according to the rankings listed at the bottom of the electronic version. The print story made a big, above-the-fold, front-page splash the following morning.

To date, none of the allegations in Gorski’s January or June reports have been substantiated.

The coach 

Ryan Clement and Jim Gmelich took over as president and principal, respectively, between the 2010 and 2011 football seasons. Looking back, Dave Logan sees a host of clues that they wanted to make a change in the football program. At the time, he viewed these clues as problems to be solved.

“It’s pretty simple to me,” Logan said. “As I’ve had now several months to reflect on this, I just think they made a decision to go in a different direction. And I’ve maintained right from the start they have every right to make that decision. You have a new president and you have a new principal, and I think they came to the conclusion that maybe football had become too big and possibly was one of the reasons that enrollment had declined.

“Now, I don’t feel that way, but I’ve got no way to prove it. Ryan brought that up to me back last June. In a meeting in his office, he said, ‘I’ve got a rock-star coach and my enrollment’s gone down 241 kids the last three years.’

“That really took me by surprise. It was my first indication there was a problem. So much so that I asked Ryan to lunch the very next day for some sort of clarification. I asked him if he supported me and the staff. He said yes, but the school was struggling financially and everything had to be looked at.

“I knew things were tough everywhere. Our economy has challenged everybody, public schools and private schools. I didn’t have all the answers, but I wanted to play a part in the solution. I told Ryan that I would help him anyway I could.”

Still, a series of incidents last season made Logan increasingly uncertain about the status of his program under the new administration. Among them:

* “My first meeting with the principal was in his office several days before school started. It was a very brief meeting, probably no more than five minutes. I came off the practice field, walked in, took my hat off, shook hands, said ‘Hello, welcome to Mullen.’ We talked briefly. He asked how my experience had been there the last two or three years. I said it had been good.

“And then he briefly got into where he’d come from — Brophy Prep down in Phoenix, he was principal at Regis for three years. What struck me afterwards was the last couple things he said. He said he had walked out on the practice field (at Regis) and watched a practice that Mike Woolford was conducting and he knew after watching that practice that Mike Woolford was not going to be the head coach at Regis. And then he looked at me and said, ‘But what principal in his right mind fires the football coach in his first year?’

“I did find that a bit of an odd comment given it was our very first interaction. My response was, ‘No, I don’t think that would be a smart thing to do.’ But I remember leaving thinking, I don’t think this guy thinks much of me. I shared that conversation with Ryan and Ryan downplayed it. He said that was just kind of Jim’s personality and just to basically move on.”

* “We were having a staff meeting during the second week of the season. The entire staff was present. An administrator came in and said because our game was on ESPN, none of the coaches or their families could park in their usual spots behind our stadium. I was aware of that being the case, but then he said that would be the rule for the rest of the season.

“I said, ‘Are you saying that we and our families can’t park back here the whole season?’ He said that was correct. I asked why. He said that was what Ryan had told him. I remember saying, ‘You mean my mom can’t park behind the stadium the whole year?’ And I got a one-word answer from the assistant athletic director: ‘Nope.’

* “A couple of weeks into the season, an administrator came into the football office and told the players that were having lunch that they were no longer allowed to eat lunch in the football office. It had been a good opportunity to watch some film and just generally interact with the players. When I asked why, he shrugged and said, ‘Jim.’

“Jim was the principal, and if that’s what he wanted, fine, but the lack of any sort of communication concerned me.”

* “I was notified about midway through the season that for the upcoming off-season, the 2012 summer workout program, that because they were instituting summer school, which they had not done at anytime during the previous eight years, and which I think is really a good idea, but that I wouldn’t be able to have contact with players until noon. And then later, noon went to 1 o’clock and then 1 o’clock went to 2 o’clock.

“Normally, we work three or four days a week from about 7:30 until about noon. When I asked when could we work with our players in the summer, I was told, ‘Well, you could bring them in at 5:45 (a.m.) until 7:30.’ Which didn’t make a lot of sense given the fact that kids in the summer live a long way from school, how they get there, transportation from their parents, it just didn’t make much sense.”

Since Logan’s departure, that rule has been rescinded and the Mullen program under new coach Tom Thenell is conducting its normal summer workouts.

* “When we got there, there were no pictures on the wall of the Spirit Center, which is not a football-only facility. There’s classrooms on the second level, there’s a weight room on the second level, the football offices are there. We put pictures of former players, not players that we’ve coached only, but former players at Mullen who’d gone on to college. We put pictures of two old-time Mullen football teams back in the ’30s because we just thought it was a nice way to recognize some of the accomplishments.

“They were going to hold an open house on a Sunday where they invite potential families to go through the school, and we meet Sundays as a staff. So I got an email from Jim Gmelich that said none of the coaches could be in the hall of the Spirit Center, that we could hold our meetings but we were to be behind closed doors.

“I questioned him on the email. I just said, ‘I want to make sure I’m clear. Do you not want us to meet?’ He said, ‘No, you can meet, but I would like you to stay in your offices with your door closed.’ Again, he was the principal, but it seemed a strange request.

“And then I overheard another administrator talking to the student hosts about how to address certain questions. And she said, ‘If anybody asks why are there only football pictures up on this wall, you’re to say this is not a football school and this will change shortly. There will be other sports up there.’

“I went in and talked to her and offered to take all the pictures down if necessary. She said that wouldn’t be necessary. And I asked why she felt it necessary to instruct Mullen students as to how to answer a question that I didn’t think would ever be raised by a potential family and she said, ‘No, you’d be surprised, we get that question all the time.'”

The sum of these incidents was to give Logan an uneasy feeling about his status at the school and that of the football program.

“I felt like there was definitely something wrong,” he said. “It didn’t feel right to me, but I couldn’t figure out what had happened. The staff was really unsettled. My message to them was, ‘Everything is going to be fine. Relax and keep working. Everything will be fine.’ But privately, I was worried.

“I didn’t want to jump to any conclusions, but I certainly did not think that I was Jim Gmelich’s guy. I had two conversations with him the entire year until my exit interview, which is highly unusual. Every other place that I’ve worked with principals, I’ve talked to them on a fairly regular basis. I didn’t know what, but my sense was something was wrong.”

The thought occurred to Logan that the new administrators were trying to make things uncomfortable enough that he would resign, relieving Clement and Gmelich of the burden of firing a local icon.

“I had that conversation with Ryan,” Logan said. “I’ve coached 19 years. I have a lot of friends that are high school coaches. And I told Ryan that I had heard from a pretty good source that before the season started, Jim had said that this would be my last year at Mullen.

“Ryan downplayed that. His answer was, ‘Dave, we need to have a succession plan. If you leave, we need to have a succession plan. If I leave, there needs to be a succession plan in place.’ And my response to that was, ‘I understand succession plans. This doesn’t appear to be in that particular realm. This is a guy that before he even met me is saying, ‘This is going to be his last year at Mullen.'”

So, did Logan consider doing what the new Mullen administrators appeared to want him to do? Did he consider resigning?

“Any coach that’s ever had to stand up in front of kids, his kids, and tell them that he’s leaving and it’s basically his idea, that’s a really tough thing to do. And up until the last meeting, I held out hope, honestly, that things were going to work out, that I could somehow, some way, make things work out. I really did. But it just didn’t turn out that way.”

What was his reaction a week after his firing when Mullen’s narrative changed from wanting a coach in the building full-time to alleged recruiting violations?

“Shocked,” Logan said. “Ryan had mentioned in our final meeting that was I aware of a couple of eighth graders on the sideline, which, listen, anybody who’s ever coached during a game . . . . I’m specific with my intention. I would tell the head track coach to make sure if there’s any kids on the sideline before the game, make sure they get in the stands.

“But once the game starts, you’ve got a headset on, you couldn’t tell. I don’t even know really, specifically, what incident he’s even talking about. While he did mention it to me in the final conversation, I was shocked that they went there. I was shocked that that became the narrative from the school or those who represent the school. Really disappointed.”

Logan has struggled over the past five months to figure out why Mullen’s administrators chose this tack, why they tried to tarnish his reputation.

“The only thing I could think of was the reaction of the community,” he said. “When the kids walked out and went through all that — you know, kids will walk out over a lot. I sent a mass email out and said please, let’s get back to work. When I met with the team that day, I told them, ‘I want you guys to stay here and finish what you’ve started.’ And then I sent the email out after the community’s response and said, ‘Let’s just move on and let everybody take a deep breath and heal. I appreciate it, but this is not really what I’m trying to accomplish.'”

Logan still believes Mullen’s administrators were entirely within their rights to fire him and didn’t need a reason. Football coaches, he has often said, get fired all the time, for a variety of reasons. Often, it’s just because new leadership wants to bring in its own guy.

“I’ve always felt they had the right to make changes as they see fit in the best interests of the school,” he said.

Afterword

One of the frustrations of a one-newspaper town is the absence of alternative narrative voices. When that single voice gets a story wrong, or becomes a vehicle for just one side of a story, it becomes necessary to find other media through which to tell the untold story.

That’s what I believe has happened in the case of Dave Logan’s firing at Mullen, and why I undertook this alternate narrative. It is certainly true that I am Logan’s friend and that, since January, I have been his on-air partner on KOA’s afternoon drive talk show. It’s also true that I was a newspaper reporter and columnist in this town for thirty years. So while it’s fair to call me biased in his favor — Logan is one of the most honorable people I know — it’s also fair for somebody to provide a rebuttal to the sensational, unsubstantiated narrative put forward by two administrators at Mullen High School with the aid of the Denver Post.

Many of the voices in this piece have not been heard from on this story before. I believe they paint a pretty clear picture. Ryan Clement and Jim Gmelich wanted to make a change in the Mullen football program. You can draw your own conclusions as to their motives. In the end, they don’t really matter. As Logan has often noted, the administrators of any school can replace the coach of any athletic program anytime they like. They don’t need a reason beyond the old staple, “We’ve decided to go in a different direction.”

Obviously, Logan’s unparalleled record of success at Mullen made changing horses a tough sell for Clement and Gmelich. As Clement’s interview with KOA the morning after the firing demonstrates, their first narrative was all about wanting coaches to be full-time faculty members. That didn’t go over well, in part because very few of Mullen’s other athletic coaches met that requirement.

So they needed another narrative and they launched one a week after the fact. It was an ugly one, an attempt to impugn the integrity of a well-known local personality whose ethics Clement himself had said were beyond reproach just a week earlier. For its own reasons, the only daily newspaper in town chose to become a vehicle for this narrative and made very little attempt to acknowledge or explore the obvious ulterior motive that might be at work.

In the end, all that matters is whether Mullen’s charges hold water. To date, five months after that first accusation — “Football violations at Mullen” — they remain unsubstantiated. Indeed, they remain unspecified to the extent that CHSAA is not even capable of investigating them.

It’s always good advice to keep your eye on the ball: CHSAA has not sanctioned Dave Logan. CHSAA is not investigating Dave Logan. Until that changes, Mullen’s vague charges should be seen for what they are — a classic case of embarrassed administrators trying to cover their behinds. They are a poor reflection on the integrity and judgment of those who have tried to tarnish Logan’s reputation.

“It’s ironic that Dave cared so much about Mullen that he worked for virtually nothing, asked me and others to spend time with them, and this is the treatment he gets in return,” business executive Charles L. Griffith told me. “The entire situation is sad and unfortunate.”

-30-

Open letter from Robert Regan

Robert A. Regan

r.regan@hotmail.com

June 2012

RE: Dave Logan

To Whom It May Concern:

For a relatively short period of time – from March 2010 to April 2011 – I was fortunate to serve as President of J.K. Mullen High School, a Christian Brothers school southwest of Denver. My wife and I developed a fond regard for the school and its wonderful community of students, faculty, coaches and families. In particular, we were especially attracted to the Lasallian culture and core values. The Mullen community is distinctly warm, welcoming, inclusive and diverse, and for this reason provides a critical choice for many families in the region. In addition to these core Lasallian values, the school has historically fostered a culture of high performance, although in recent years some of these standards were allowed to decline. But not its football program.

As President, I functioned as the chief executive officer of the school with responsibility for all aspects of the institution, especially board relations, strategy, financial management, fundraising and community relations. Among my direct reports was the school’s Principal, who had day to day responsibility for the academic and operational elements of the school, including the athletic program. Although I was not responsible for evaluating coaches, I took a keen interest in our athletic programs since they represent an essential part of the overall school experience and reputation.

From the outset, I was extremely impressed with Dave Logan and the school’s football program. Aside from the several state championships under Dave’s leadership, I was proud of the way Dave managed the program. From my perspective his team was disciplined, totally prepared, totally buttoned up at all times, supportive of each other, and behaved in a manner that brought pride and positive recognition to the school. In fact, I remember receiving an unsolicited letter from a team photographer saying that she had worked with many schools and colleges in Colorado, and the Mullen football team was the most gracious and respectful group of young athletes she had ever dealt with. This was clearly a tribute to the values instilled by Dave and his coaches. As an educator, it was also my distinct feeling that Dave Logan and his coaches took a holistic approach to their coaching responsibilities and focused thoughtfully on youth development, team work, school pride and classroom performance – and not just winning games. I also felt that Dave’s prestige in the Denver community was a powerful asset for the school. Dave himself was generous in offering his personal support and urged me to take greater advantage of the opportunity to engage him in promoting the school to the larger Denver community. And so I did. Dave joined me on two occasions to meet with the President of the Mullen Foundation and helped us secure the largest gift during my presidency – a pledge of $175,000.

Dave and I did not agree on all matters and on a few occasions had difficult conversations regarding school policy and disciplinary actions. But I never for a moment doubted his commitment to the school and its Lasallian values, or his respect for my leadership. He spoke his peace privately and articulately, and then moved on as a responsible member of the Mullen community. It saddens me to learn of the current accusations against the Mullen football program under Dave’s leadership. As President, I was not aware of any ethical breaches and truly believe that Dave is a person of great integrity, and a tremendous asset to any school. I know the families and players would agree with me.

Don’t hesitate to contact me if I can offer further clarification.

Respectfully,

Bob Regan


Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you

It was probably past time for Jim Tracy to get thrown out of a game. Too bad he didn’t kick dirt over home plate or pull up first base or turn his hat around so he could go nose-to-nose with Greg Gibson. I mean, if you’re getting tossed anyway, get your money’s worth. That’s what Earl Weaver used to say.

On the precipice of a five-game losing streak, their starting pitching now in the conversation for the worst of all time, the Rockies came to bat in the bottom of the ninth Sunday trailing the Los Angeles Angels 10-7.

They got one back immediately. Tyler Colvin led off with a double to the opposite field off Scott Downs, a tough left-hander, and Marco Scutaro followed with a single to center. Colvin scored and the Rocks were within two. It was the first earned run Downs had surrendered in 24 appearances covering 20 2/3 innings this season.

Despite the sorry state of the home team, which fell to 11 games below .500 at 24-35, 37,722 fans showed up at Coors Field on a beautiful, cool afternoon, and most of them were still there. They rose to cheer a comeback that might salvage one game from the series.

Carlos Gonzalez, who had three hits, including both his 16th home run and a bunt single, drilled a shot head-high back up the middle. Downs lifted his glove, at least partly in self-defense, and the ball found it.

“He caught the ball,” Tracy said afterward.

Scutaro had started toward second and Downs realized he had a chance to double him off first. He reached into his glove even as the momentum of CarGo’s shot drove him backward. The ball fell out of his glove and hit the ground. This happens all the time at second base as pivot men try to turn the double play. The umpire calls the runner out at second, signaling that the catch was made and the ball dropped in the exchange to the throwing hand. This was not the call Gibson made.

“He called it a no catch, and I’m not going to speak any more about it,” Tracy said before speaking just a little more about it.

“I put myself in a real position to get in a heck of a lot of trouble, but personally I felt like he caught the ball. He caught the ball and was reaching for the ball because ‘Scootie’ was kind of hung out to dry. On a ball that’s hit that hard, if that ball is not caught, you see the ball hit in the glove and immediately come back out. He had possession and he was starting to fall back and he was reaching into the glove to try to take the ball and throw it to first base. That’s what I saw. That’s all I have to say about it.”

Gibson not only made the wrong call, he made it badly, failing to communicate to fans or even the runner at first base what the heck was going on. Suddenly, the Angels were picking up the ball, throwing it to second, then throwing it to first for a conventional double play while Scutaro and Gonzalez looked on in amazement.

Tracy bolted from the dugout with surprising alacrity and confronted Gibson along the first-base line, obviously stupefied. It took him maybe a minute to get tossed. The effect of the call was to leave the Rocks with two out and nobody on. Michael Cuddyer managed a two-out single, but Todd Helton’s pop out completed the Angels’ sweep (the Rocks are now 0-6 in interleague play) and extended the losing streak to five.

“You don’t want to see that, especially in the ninth inning with no outs, representing the tie run at the plate and having Cuddyer on deck and Todd,” CarGo said. “It’s frustrating. It’s even more frustrating than everything else.

“He caught the ball. It’s amazing he caught that ball. It was even harder for me to see the ball coming off the bat and I’m sure the pitcher didn’t see the ball well. And the umpire didn’t see it at all. I guess the first thing he saw was when (Downs) was doing the turn to throw the ball to first base and as soon as (Gibson) saw the ball on the ground, he called it was no catch. But I watched the replay.

“I hit the ball, I saw he caught the ball, I shut it down, and then I was looking to first base when the umpire was calling no catch. So I turn around because I was confused, I didn’t know who was going to make the call, and I didn’t see the umpire because his hand was already down. He was just standing out there. Confusion. They throw the ball to second and they throw the ball to first. There was no chance for me to get to first base. It was tough. I think it was the wrong call because he caught the ball.

“It’s a different situation, man on first, one out. With one out, we still have a chance. With two outs, you have to create a situation again. Cuddyer did a great job getting on base and it’s a tough lefty for a lefty. That’s why Todd didn’t come through and hit the ball up to third base.

“I was in shock. First I was surprised that he caught the ball. I was more surprised that he called it a double play. I leave everything to the manager. He did anything possible to make a change. What can I do about it? I just walked back to the dugout. I knew I was out because he caught the ball, but not a double play.”

This has nothing to do with the team’s basic problem, of course. The Rocks put up 13 hits and scored eight runs. Christian Friedrich lasted four innings, which was longer than three Rockies starters in the last four games, surrendering nine runs, eight of them earned, and 10 hits. The day before, Jeff Francis surrendered eight runs in 3 1/3 innings. The starting pitching is just stunningly bad.

“I actually felt great,” said Friedrich, who now carries an earned-run average of 1.80 in four road starts and 12.60 in three starts at Coors Field. “I felt better than the last start. We had a good plan, I just didn’t execute the pitches.”

The position players don’t want to hear that any more than you do, although you do feel a little sorry for Friedrich, a rookie, taking the weight for veteran pitchers who have spit the bit.

“Offensively, we did a great job,” CarGo said. “It was a bad day again for the pitchers. To score 10 runs is a lot of pressure for us, but we did everything possible. We did everything we can. We just fell short again.”

Gibson’s bad call killed the Rockies’ final hope for a comeback. The umpires were escorted off the field to a symphonic catcall chorus from the faithful.

But, hey, Gibson’s screw-up did have one redeeming quality: For one day, it gave the Rocks someone to be mad at other than themselves.